rs885822

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_001083116.3(PRF1):​c.900C>T​(p.His300His) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.614 in 1,614,034 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 307,077 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.67 ( 34484 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.61 ( 272593 hom. )

Consequence

PRF1
NM_001083116.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.15

Publications

54 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
PRF1 (HGNC:9360): (perforin 1) This gene encodes a protein with structural similarities to complement component C9 that is important in immunity. This protein forms membrane pores that allow the release of granzymes and subsequent cytolysis of target cells. Whether pore formation occurs in the plasma membrane of target cells or in an endosomal membrane inside target cells is subject to debate. Mutations in this gene are associated with a variety of human disease including diabetes, multiple sclerosis, lymphomas, autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome (ALPS), aplastic anemia, and familial hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis type 2 (FHL2), a rare and lethal autosomal recessive disorder of early childhood. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]
PALD1 (HGNC:23530): (phosphatase domain containing paladin 1) Predicted to enable protein tyrosine phosphatase activity. Predicted to be involved in peptidyl-tyrosine dephosphorylation. Located in cytosol. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.95).
BP6
Variant 10-70598821-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-70598821-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 257409.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-2.15 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.799 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
PRF1NM_001083116.3 linkc.900C>T p.His300His synonymous_variant Exon 3 of 3 ENST00000441259.2 NP_001076585.1 P14222
PRF1NM_005041.6 linkc.900C>T p.His300His synonymous_variant Exon 3 of 3 NP_005032.2 P14222

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
PRF1ENST00000441259.2 linkc.900C>T p.His300His synonymous_variant Exon 3 of 3 5 NM_001083116.3 ENSP00000398568.1 P14222

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.667
AC:
101343
AN:
152030
Hom.:
34448
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.806
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.576
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.643
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.570
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.742
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.620
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.658
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.589
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.593
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.642
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.637
AC:
160204
AN:
251422
AF XY:
0.628
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.807
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.682
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.573
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.764
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.648
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.589
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.626
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.609
AC:
889918
AN:
1461886
Hom.:
272593
Cov.:
106
AF XY:
0.608
AC XY:
442233
AN XY:
727244
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.810
AC:
27113
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.676
AC:
30218
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.569
AC:
14877
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.737
AC:
29240
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.618
AC:
53265
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.642
AC:
34307
AN:
53418
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.639
AC:
3683
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.593
AC:
659856
AN:
1112008
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.619
AC:
37359
AN:
60394
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.482
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
26877
53754
80630
107507
134384
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
18172
36344
54516
72688
90860
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.667
AC:
101431
AN:
152148
Hom.:
34484
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.668
AC XY:
49665
AN XY:
74380
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.806
AC:
33469
AN:
41504
American (AMR)
AF:
0.643
AC:
9844
AN:
15304
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.570
AC:
1977
AN:
3466
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.742
AC:
3830
AN:
5164
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.620
AC:
2988
AN:
4820
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.658
AC:
6975
AN:
10598
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.588
AC:
173
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.593
AC:
40300
AN:
67974
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.639
AC:
1351
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.500
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1724
3448
5171
6895
8619
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
796
1592
2388
3184
3980
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.625
Hom.:
56872
Bravo
AF:
0.673
Asia WGS
AF:
0.633
AC:
2201
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.591
EpiControl
AF:
0.581

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:12Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Familial hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis 2 Benign:6
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 01, 2025
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Oct 10, 2014
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 25, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:4
-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 29, 2016
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are pr eliminary notes: Frequency -

Nov 12, 2023
Unidad de Genómica Garrahan, Hospital de Pediatría Garrahan
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as Benign based on local population frequency. This variant was detected in 81% of patients studied by a panel of primary immunodeficiencies. Number of patients: 78. Only high quality variants are reported. -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:1Other:1
-
GenomeConnect, ClinGen
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:phenotyping only

Variant interpreted as Benign and reported on 04-27-2020 by Lab or GTR ID 500031. GenomeConnect assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. GenomeConnect staff make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. This variant was reported in an individual referred for clinical diagnostic genetic testing. -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Lymphoma, non-Hodgkin, familial Benign:1
Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.95
CADD
Benign
0.061
DANN
Benign
0.41
PhyloP100
-2.1
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs885822; hg19: chr10-72358577; COSMIC: COSV64615053; API