rs886038738

Variant names:

• chr8-93808848-G-A
• rs886038738
• NM_153704.6:c.2448G>A

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

• chr8-93808848-G-A
• chr8-93808848-G-C
• chr8-93808848-G-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2 BP4_Moderate BP6 BP7

The NM_153704.6(TMEM67):​c.2448G>A​(p.Leu816Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000028 in 1,604,986 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. L816L) has been classified as Likely benign.

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.000026 (0 hom., cov: 31)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.000028 (0 hom.)
• Consequence: TMEM67 NM_153704.6 synonymous
• Clinical Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3 B:2
• Conservation: PhyloP100: 0.882
• Publications: 0 publications found

Genes affected

TMEM67 (HGNC:28396): (transmembrane protein 67) The protein encoded by this gene localizes to the primary cilium and to the plasma membrane. The gene functions in centriole migration to the apical membrane and formation of the primary cilium. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. Defects in this gene are a cause of Meckel syndrome type 3 (MKS3) and Joubert syndrome type 6 (JBTS6). [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2008]

TMEM67 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

• ciliopathy

  Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
• COACH syndrome 1

  Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
• Meckel syndrome, type 3

  Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
• nephronophthisis 11

  Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
• COACH syndrome 1

  Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Ambry Genetics
• Joubert syndrome 6

  Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
• Joubert syndrome

  Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
• Meckel syndrome

  Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
• Senior-Boichis syndrome

  Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

ACMG classification

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.

• PM2: Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage
• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.43).
• BP6: Variant 8-93808848-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr8-93808848-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 262745.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submission is: [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity].
• BP7: Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.882 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
TMEM67	NM_153704.6	c.2448G>A	p.Leu816Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 24 of 28	ENST00000453321.8	NP_714915.3

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
TMEM67	ENST00000453321.8	c.2448G>A	p.Leu816Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 24 of 28	1	NM_153704.6	ENSP00000389998.3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000264 AC: 4 AN: 151720 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.00

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.0000590

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00

GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000399 AC: 1 AN: 250606 AF XY: 0.00

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.00000883

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.00

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000282 AC: 41 AN: 1453266 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.0000249 AC XY: 18 AN XY: 723540

African (AFR) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 33244

American (AMR) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 44656

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 26030

East Asian (EAS) AF: 0.0000759 AC: 3 AN: 39534

South Asian (SAS) AF: 0.0000116 AC: 1 AN: 85920

European-Finnish (FIN) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 53394

Middle Eastern (MID) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 5744

European-Non Finnish (NFE) AF: 0.0000335 AC: 37 AN: 1104684

Other (OTH) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 60060

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000264 AC: 4 AN: 151720 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0 AN XY: 74108

African (AFR) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 41336

American (AMR) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 15226

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 3470

East Asian (EAS) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 5184

South Asian (SAS) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 4816

European-Finnish (FIN) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 10542

Middle Eastern (MID) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 316

European-Non Finnish (NFE) AF: 0.0000590 AC: 4 AN: 67844

Other (OTH) AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 2076

Alfa AF: 0.00 Hom.: 0

Bravo AF: 0.0000264

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:3 Benign:2

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

Submissions by phenotype

Meckel syndrome, type 3 Uncertain:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Nephronophthisis 11 Uncertain:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Joubert syndrome 6 Uncertain:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

not specified Benign:1

-

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Meckel-Gruber syndrome;C0431399:Joubert syndrome Benign:1

Feb 09, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.43
CADD	Benign	3.8
DANN	Benign	0.68
PhyloP100		0.88

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.11		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs886038738; hg19: chr8-94821076;