rs886038749
Variant names:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -11 ACMG points: 2P and 13B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7
The NM_181426.2(CCDC39):c.2280A>G(p.Thr760Thr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000236 in 1,271,432 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: not found (cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000024 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
CCDC39
NM_181426.2 synonymous
NM_181426.2 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.120
Publications
0 publications found
Genes affected
CCDC39 (HGNC:25244): (coiled-coil domain 39 molecular ruler complex subunit) The protein encoded by this gene is involved in the motility of cilia and flagella. The encoded protein is essential for the assembly of dynein regulatory and inner dynein arm complexes, which regulate ciliary beat. Defects in this gene are a cause of primary ciliary dyskinesia type 14 (CILD14). [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2011]
TTC14 (HGNC:24697): (tetratricopeptide repeat domain 14) Predicted to enable nucleic acid binding activity. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification was made for transcript
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -11 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.72).
BP6
Variant 3-180616952-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-180616952-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 262968.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.12 with no splicing effect.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
32
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000114 AC: 2AN: 175830 AF XY: 0.0000105 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
AC:
2
AN:
175830
AF XY:
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000236 AC: 3AN: 1271432Hom.: 0 Cov.: 22 AF XY: 0.00000158 AC XY: 1AN XY: 633688 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
3
AN:
1271432
Hom.:
Cov.:
22
AF XY:
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
633688
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
28062
American (AMR)
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
33850
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
23856
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
37788
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
72788
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
49236
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
5308
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
AC:
2
AN:
967040
Other (OTH)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
53504
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.475
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1
1
2
2
3
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
32
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
ClinVar
Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:1
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing
- -
Primary ciliary dyskinesia Benign:1
Nov 24, 2023
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
DANN
Benign
PhyloP100
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at
Publications
You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.