rs886054243
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 3 ACMG points: 3P and 0B. PM2PP3
The NM_000159.4(GCDH):c.852+5G>A variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000224 in 1,609,742 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 2/3 splice prediction tools predicting alterations to normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000159.4 splice_region, intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCDH | NM_000159.4 | c.852+5G>A | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | ENST00000222214.10 | NP_000150.1 | |||
GCDH | NM_013976.5 | c.852+5G>A | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | NP_039663.1 | ||||
GCDH | NR_102316.1 | n.1015+5G>A | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | |||||
GCDH | NR_102317.1 | n.1233+5G>A | splice_region_variant, intron_variant |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152192Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000411 AC: 1AN: 243058Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 132168
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000240 AC: 35AN: 1457550Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000234 AC XY: 17AN XY: 725106
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152192Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000134 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74362
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Glutaric aciduria, type 1 Pathogenic:1Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Mar 01, 2017 | - - |
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Baylor Genetics | Nov 24, 2023 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 28, 2017 | The GCDH c.852+5G>A variant has been reported in one study in which it was found in one individual with glutaric acidemia in a compound heterozygous state with a missense variant (Bijarnia et al. 2008). Control data are unavailable for this variant which is not found in the 1000 Genomes Project, the Exome Sequencing Project, or the Exome Aggregation Consortium. Only 10% of normal glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenase activity was found in cultured skin fibroblasts from the individual. The evidence for this variant is limited to a single individual. The c.852+5G>A variant is therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance but suspicious for pathogenicity for glutaric acidemia. This variant was observed by ICSL as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. - |
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jul 21, 2022 | Variant summary: GCDH c.852+5G>A alters a conserved nucleotide located close to a canonical splice site and therefore could affect mRNA splicing, leading to a significantly altered protein sequence. Several computational tools predict a significant impact on normal splicing: Four predict the variant weakens a 5' donor site. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 4.1e-06 in 243058 control chromosomes (gnomAD). The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.852+5G>A has been reported in the literature in an individual affected with Glutaric Acidemia Type 1 (Bijarnia_2008). These data do not allow any conclusion about variant significance. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Two ClinVar submitters (evaluation after 2014) cite the variant as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at