rs886055151
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7
The NM_000079.4(CHRNA1):c.111C>T(p.Ser37=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000242 in 1,613,876 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000039 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000023 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
CHRNA1
NM_000079.4 synonymous
NM_000079.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -2.65
Genes affected
CHRNA1 (HGNC:1955): (cholinergic receptor nicotinic alpha 1 subunit) The muscle acetylcholine receptor consiststs of 5 subunits of 4 different types: 2 alpha subunits and 1 each of the beta, gamma, and delta subunits. This gene encodes an alpha subunit that plays a role in acetlycholine binding/channel gating. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been identified. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2012]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.62).
BP6
Variant 2-174759566-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-174759566-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 332451.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Uncertain_significance=2}.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-2.65 with no splicing effect.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHRNA1 | NM_000079.4 | c.111C>T | p.Ser37= | synonymous_variant | 2/9 | ENST00000348749.9 | NP_000070.1 | |
CHRNA1 | NM_001039523.3 | c.111C>T | p.Ser37= | synonymous_variant | 2/10 | NP_001034612.1 | ||
CHRNA1 | XM_017003256.2 | c.132C>T | p.Ser44= | synonymous_variant | 1/9 | XP_016858745.1 | ||
CHRNA1 | XM_017003257.2 | c.132C>T | p.Ser44= | synonymous_variant | 1/8 | XP_016858746.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHRNA1 | ENST00000348749.9 | c.111C>T | p.Ser37= | synonymous_variant | 2/9 | 1 | NM_000079.4 | ENSP00000261008 | P1 | |
ENST00000442996.1 | n.322-13183G>A | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant | 1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000395 AC: 6AN: 152026Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
6
AN:
152026
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000239 AC: 6AN: 251326Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000221 AC XY: 3AN XY: 135810
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
6
AN:
251326
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
135810
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000226 AC: 33AN: 1461850Hom.: 0 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.0000220 AC XY: 16AN XY: 727216
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
33
AN:
1461850
Hom.:
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
AC XY:
16
AN XY:
727216
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000395 AC: 6AN: 152026Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74246
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
6
AN:
152026
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
74246
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Lethal multiple pterygium syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jun 20, 2022 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Congenital myasthenic syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at