rs889010
Variant names:
Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The NM_020389.3(TRPC7):c.1845-5673G>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.637 in 151,942 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 31,918 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.64 ( 31918 hom., cov: 31)
Consequence
TRPC7
NM_020389.3 intron
NM_020389.3 intron
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Not reported in ClinVar
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.118
Publications
2 publications found
Genes affected
TRPC7 (HGNC:20754): (transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily C member 7) Predicted to enable inositol 1,4,5 trisphosphate binding activity and store-operated calcium channel activity. Predicted to be involved in metal ion transport; regulation of cytosolic calcium ion concentration; and single fertilization. Predicted to act upstream of or within calcium ion transport. Predicted to be located in plasma membrane. Predicted to be part of cation channel complex. Predicted to be integral component of plasma membrane. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification was made for transcript
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.9).
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.821 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRPC7 | NM_020389.3 | c.1845-5673G>T | intron_variant | Intron 7 of 11 | ENST00000513104.6 | NP_065122.1 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRPC7 | ENST00000513104.6 | c.1845-5673G>T | intron_variant | Intron 7 of 11 | 5 | NM_020389.3 | ENSP00000426070.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.637 AC: 96652AN: 151826Hom.: 31866 Cov.: 31 show subpopulations
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
96652
AN:
151826
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
We have no GnomAD4 exomes data on this position. Probably position not covered by the project.
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.637 AC: 96752AN: 151942Hom.: 31918 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.632 AC XY: 46878AN XY: 74214 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
96752
AN:
151942
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
46878
AN XY:
74214
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
AC:
34363
AN:
41466
American (AMR)
AF:
AC:
7949
AN:
15264
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
AC:
2127
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
AC:
3201
AN:
5136
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
AC:
2828
AN:
4808
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
AC:
5754
AN:
10540
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
AC:
187
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
AC:
38592
AN:
67948
Other (OTH)
AF:
AC:
1344
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1684
3368
5051
6735
8419
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Age Distribution
Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
774
1548
2322
3096
3870
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
2179
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
DANN
Benign
PhyloP100
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at
Publications
You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.