rs891087

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_000208.4(INSR):​c.783C>T​(p.Asp261Asp) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0972 in 1,613,664 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 8,822 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.12 ( 1311 hom., cov: 30)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.095 ( 7511 hom. )

Consequence

INSR
NM_000208.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.90

Publications

21 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
INSR (HGNC:6091): (insulin receptor) This gene encodes a member of the receptor tyrosine kinase family of proteins. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate alpha and beta subunits that form a heterotetrameric receptor. Binding of insulin or other ligands to this receptor activates the insulin signaling pathway, which regulates glucose uptake and release, as well as the synthesis and storage of carbohydrates, lipids and protein. Mutations in this gene underlie the inherited severe insulin resistance syndromes including type A insulin resistance syndrome, Donohue syndrome and Rabson-Mendenhall syndrome. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2015]
INSR Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • insulin-resistance syndrome type A
    Inheritance: AD, AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp, G2P
  • Donohue syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp, G2P
  • hyperinsulinism due to INSR deficiency
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics
  • Rabson-Mendenhall syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.73).
BP6
Variant 19-7184507-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-7184507-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 330475.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.9 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.197 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
INSRNM_000208.4 linkc.783C>T p.Asp261Asp synonymous_variant Exon 3 of 22 ENST00000302850.10 NP_000199.2
INSRNM_001079817.3 linkc.783C>T p.Asp261Asp synonymous_variant Exon 3 of 21 NP_001073285.1
INSRXM_011527988.3 linkc.783C>T p.Asp261Asp synonymous_variant Exon 3 of 22 XP_011526290.2
INSRXM_011527989.4 linkc.783C>T p.Asp261Asp synonymous_variant Exon 3 of 21 XP_011526291.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
INSRENST00000302850.10 linkc.783C>T p.Asp261Asp synonymous_variant Exon 3 of 22 1 NM_000208.4 ENSP00000303830.4
INSRENST00000341500.9 linkc.783C>T p.Asp261Asp synonymous_variant Exon 3 of 21 1 ENSP00000342838.4
INSRENST00000598216.1 linkn.758C>T non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 3 of 10 1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.119
AC:
17993
AN:
151774
Hom.:
1303
Cov.:
30
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.200
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.199
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0789
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0550
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0422
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.182
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0727
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0981
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0887
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.110
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0973
AC:
24425
AN:
251000
AF XY:
0.101
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.204
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0579
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0506
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0406
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0780
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0881
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0942
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0949
AC:
138791
AN:
1461772
Hom.:
7511
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0970
AC XY:
70513
AN XY:
727180
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.202
AC:
6751
AN:
33478
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0606
AC:
2710
AN:
44722
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0510
AC:
1334
AN:
26134
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0532
AC:
2112
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.178
AC:
15383
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0766
AC:
4088
AN:
53384
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.105
AC:
607
AN:
5766
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0898
AC:
99868
AN:
1111938
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0983
AC:
5938
AN:
60392
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.484
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
6688
13376
20064
26752
33440
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
3812
7624
11436
15248
19060
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.119
AC:
18029
AN:
151892
Hom.:
1311
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.119
AC XY:
8795
AN XY:
74214
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.200
AC:
8294
AN:
41376
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0787
AC:
1199
AN:
15232
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0550
AC:
191
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0421
AC:
218
AN:
5178
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.182
AC:
872
AN:
4802
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0727
AC:
767
AN:
10554
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0986
AC:
29
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0887
AC:
6031
AN:
67966
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.117
AC:
247
AN:
2108
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.504
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
772
1545
2317
3090
3862
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
208
416
624
832
1040
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0908
Hom.:
573
Bravo
AF:
0.121
Asia WGS
AF:
0.167
AC:
578
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0885
EpiControl
AF:
0.0873

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Jan 14, 2021
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:1
Jan 26, 2018
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Leprechaunism syndrome;C0271695:Rabson-Mendenhall syndrome;C0342278:Insulin-resistant diabetes mellitus AND acanthosis nigricans;C1864952:Hyperinsulinism due to INSR deficiency Benign:1
Sep 27, 2021
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Insulin-resistant diabetes mellitus AND acanthosis nigricans Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Rabson-Mendenhall syndrome Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Leprechaunism syndrome Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.73
CADD
Benign
5.8
DANN
Benign
0.69
PhyloP100
-1.9
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs891087; hg19: chr19-7184518; COSMIC: COSV57161309; API