rs901854
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_001378452.1(ITPR1):c.7689G>A(p.Lys2563=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.607 in 1,590,260 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 291,925 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.60 ( 26468 hom., cov: 24)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.61 ( 265457 hom. )
Consequence
ITPR1
NM_001378452.1 synonymous
NM_001378452.1 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 1.44
Genes affected
ITPR1 (HGNC:6180): (inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor type 1) This gene encodes an intracellular receptor for inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate. Upon stimulation by inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate, this receptor mediates calcium release from the endoplasmic reticulum. Mutations in this gene cause spinocerebellar ataxia type 15, a disease associated with an heterogeneous group of cerebellar disorders. Multiple transcript variants have been identified for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2009]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
BP4
?
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.45).
BP6
?
Variant 3-4814550-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-4814550-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 129304.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr3-4814550-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
?
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.44 with no splicing effect.
BA1
?
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.702 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITPR1 | NM_001378452.1 | c.7689G>A | p.Lys2563= | synonymous_variant | 58/62 | ENST00000649015.2 | |
LOC124906209 | XR_007095795.1 | n.725-119C>T | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITPR1 | ENST00000649015.2 | c.7689G>A | p.Lys2563= | synonymous_variant | 58/62 | NM_001378452.1 | |||
ENST00000693140.1 | n.581+11196C>T | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.595 AC: 88686AN: 148982Hom.: 26453 Cov.: 24
GnomAD3 genomes
?
AF:
AC:
88686
AN:
148982
Hom.:
Cov.:
24
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.604 AC: 149857AN: 248248Hom.: 45734 AF XY: 0.605 AC XY: 81516AN XY: 134688
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
149857
AN:
248248
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
81516
AN XY:
134688
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.608 AC: 876888AN: 1441170Hom.: 265457 Cov.: 36 AF XY: 0.609 AC XY: 436309AN XY: 716730
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
876888
AN:
1441170
Hom.:
Cov.:
36
AF XY:
AC XY:
436309
AN XY:
716730
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.595 AC: 88729AN: 149090Hom.: 26468 Cov.: 24 AF XY: 0.594 AC XY: 43117AN XY: 72560
GnomAD4 genome
?
AF:
AC:
88729
AN:
149090
Hom.:
Cov.:
24
AF XY:
AC XY:
43117
AN XY:
72560
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
2056
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | - | Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jul 05, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Jul 15, 2019 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Gillespie syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Aug 19, 2021 | - - |
Spinocerebellar ataxia type 29 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Aug 19, 2021 | - - |
Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Spinocerebellar ataxia type 15/16 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Aug 19, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
Cadd
Benign
Dann
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at