rs910068556
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 0P and 7B. BP4_ModerateBP6BS2
The NM_000548.5(TSC2):c.1774A>G(p.Ser592Gly) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000558 in 1,613,278 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000548.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152244Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000548 AC: 8AN: 1461034Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00000688 AC XY: 5AN XY: 726826
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152244Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000134 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74374
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Tuberous sclerosis 2 Uncertain:1Benign:1
- -
- -
Lymphangiomyomatosis;C1846385:Isolated focal cortical dysplasia type II;C1860707:Tuberous sclerosis 2 Uncertain:1
- -
not provided Uncertain:1
Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at