rs921412303
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 1 ACMG points: 2P and 1B. PM2BP4
The NM_016938.5(EFEMP2):c.110C>T(p.Thr37Met) variant causes a missense, splice region change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000709 in 1,551,058 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_016938.5 missense, splice_region
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 1 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFEMP2 | NM_016938.5 | c.110C>T | p.Thr37Met | missense_variant, splice_region_variant | 2/11 | ENST00000307998.11 | NP_058634.4 | |
EFEMP2 | NR_037718.2 | n.235C>T | splice_region_variant, non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 2/12 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFEMP2 | ENST00000307998.11 | c.110C>T | p.Thr37Met | missense_variant, splice_region_variant | 2/11 | 1 | NM_016938.5 | ENSP00000309953 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152134Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000128 AC: 2AN: 156186Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 82276
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000643 AC: 9AN: 1398924Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000145 AC XY: 1AN XY: 689988
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152134Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74310
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Cutis laxa, autosomal recessive, type 1B Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 29, 2016 | Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function output the following: (SIFT: "Deleterious"; PolyPhen-2: "Benign"; Align-GVGD: "Class C0"). The methionine amino acid residue is found in multiple mammalian species, suggesting that this missense change does not adversely affect protein function. These predictions have not been confirmed by published functional studies. In summary, this variant is a rare missense change that is not predicted to affect protein function, but has an uncertain effect on mRNA splicing. This variant is not anticipated to cause disease; however, the available evidence is currently insufficient to prove that conclusively. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of sequence changes on RNA splicing suggest that this variant may alter RNA splicing, but this prediction has not been confirmed by published transcriptional studies. This variant is not present in population databases (ExAC no frequency) and has not been reported in the literature in individuals with an EFEMP2-related disease. This sequence change replaces threonine with methionine at codon 37 of the EFEMP2 protein (p.Thr37Met). The threonine residue is highly conserved and there is a moderate physicochemical difference between threonine and methionine. - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Mar 24, 2022 | The p.T37M variant (also known as c.110C>T), located in coding exon 1 of the EFEMP2 gene, results from a C to T substitution at nucleotide position 110. The threonine at codon 37 is replaced by methionine, an amino acid with similar properties. This amino acid position is conserved. In addition, the in silico prediction for this alteration is inconclusive. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at