rs925410997
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 2P and 11B. PM2BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7
The NM_005732.4(RAD50):c.3603C>T(p.Cys1201=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: not found (cov: 32)
Consequence
RAD50
NM_005732.4 synonymous
NM_005732.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 1.46
Genes affected
RAD50 (HGNC:9816): (RAD50 double strand break repair protein) The protein encoded by this gene is highly similar to Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad50, a protein involved in DNA double-strand break repair. This protein forms a complex with MRE11 and NBS1. The protein complex binds to DNA and displays numerous enzymatic activities that are required for nonhomologous joining of DNA ends. This protein, cooperating with its partners, is important for DNA double-strand break repair, cell cycle checkpoint activation, telomere maintenance, and meiotic recombination. Knockout studies of the mouse homolog suggest this gene is essential for cell growth and viability. Mutations in this gene are the cause of Nijmegen breakage syndrome-like disorder.[provided by RefSeq, Apr 2010]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.19).
BP6
Variant 5-132638208-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-132638208-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 457458.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.46 with no splicing effect.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RAD50 | NM_005732.4 | c.3603C>T | p.Cys1201= | synonymous_variant | 23/25 | ENST00000378823.8 | |
TH2LCRR | NR_132124.1 | n.103G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 2/3 | |||
TH2LCRR | NR_132125.1 | n.247G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 3/3 | |||
TH2LCRR | NR_132126.1 | n.232G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 2/2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RAD50 | ENST00000378823.8 | c.3603C>T | p.Cys1201= | synonymous_variant | 23/25 | 1 | NM_005732.4 | P1 | |
TH2LCRR | ENST00000435042.1 | n.340G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 4/4 | 5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
32
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome
Cov.:
32
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
32
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jun 06, 2016 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Nov 13, 2019 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at