rs9322965

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_020366.4(RPGRIP1):​c.1797G>A​(p.Pro599Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.229 in 1,613,316 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 44,140 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.22 ( 3898 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.23 ( 40242 hom. )

Consequence

RPGRIP1
NM_020366.4 synonymous

Scores

3

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.372

Publications

16 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
RPGRIP1 (HGNC:13436): (RPGR interacting protein 1) This gene encodes a photoreceptor protein that interacts with retinitis pigmentosa GTPase regulator protein and is a key component of cone and rod photoreceptor cells. Mutations in this gene lead to autosomal recessive congenital blindness. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]
RPGRIP1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • cone-rod dystrophy 13
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
  • Leber congenital amaurosis 6
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
  • cone-rod dystrophy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Leber congenital amaurosis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (REVEL=0.139).
BP6
Variant 14-21324652-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-21324652-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 99812.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.372 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (SAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.254 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
RPGRIP1NM_020366.4 linkc.1797G>A p.Pro599Pro synonymous_variant Exon 15 of 25 ENST00000400017.7 NP_065099.3 Q96KN7-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
RPGRIP1ENST00000400017.7 linkc.1797G>A p.Pro599Pro synonymous_variant Exon 15 of 25 1 NM_020366.4 ENSP00000382895.2 Q96KN7-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.220
AC:
33490
AN:
152024
Hom.:
3899
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.228
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.231
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.146
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.184
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0187
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.265
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.256
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.271
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.241
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.205
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.207
AC:
51517
AN:
249100
AF XY:
0.214
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.226
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.105
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.185
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0159
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.259
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.239
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.217
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.230
AC:
335615
AN:
1461174
Hom.:
40242
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.231
AC XY:
167974
AN XY:
726906
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.225
AC:
7545
AN:
33470
American (AMR)
AF:
0.113
AC:
5056
AN:
44722
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.179
AC:
4674
AN:
26132
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0195
AC:
775
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.273
AC:
23511
AN:
86246
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.262
AC:
13939
AN:
53270
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.237
AC:
1365
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.239
AC:
265119
AN:
1111506
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.226
AC:
13631
AN:
60360
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.474
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
13995
27989
41984
55978
69973
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
8910
17820
26730
35640
44550
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.220
AC:
33522
AN:
152142
Hom.:
3898
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.219
AC XY:
16282
AN XY:
74386
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.228
AC:
9482
AN:
41516
American (AMR)
AF:
0.146
AC:
2231
AN:
15272
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.184
AC:
639
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0187
AC:
97
AN:
5188
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.266
AC:
1281
AN:
4818
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.256
AC:
2702
AN:
10574
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.264
AC:
77
AN:
292
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.241
AC:
16364
AN:
67988
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.208
AC:
439
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.503
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1341
2682
4024
5365
6706
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
360
720
1080
1440
1800
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.228
Hom.:
13494
Bravo
AF:
0.209
Asia WGS
AF:
0.176
AC:
614
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.232
EpiControl
AF:
0.227

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 21, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

not provided Benign:1Other:1
-
Retina International
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:literature only

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Leber congenital amaurosis 6;C2750720:Cone-rod dystrophy 13 Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Cone-rod dystrophy 13 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Leber congenital amaurosis 6 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.25
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.75
CADD
Benign
6.9
DANN
Benign
0.86
PhyloP100
-0.37
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.040
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs9322965; hg19: chr14-21792811; COSMIC: COSV99251668; COSMIC: COSV99251668; API