rs9411449
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_015046.7(SETX):c.1077T>C(p.Tyr359Tyr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.804 in 1,611,662 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 531,185 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_015046.7 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- amyotrophic lateral sclerosis type 4Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- distal hereditary motor neuropathyInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- spinocerebellar ataxia, autosomal recessive, with axonal neuropathy 2Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.750 AC: 114024AN: 151968Hom.: 44069 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.752 AC: 188932AN: 251112 AF XY: 0.753 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.810 AC: 1181901AN: 1459576Hom.: 487094 Cov.: 39 AF XY: 0.805 AC XY: 584694AN XY: 726210 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.750 AC: 114096AN: 152086Hom.: 44091 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.744 AC XY: 55341AN XY: 74338 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:10
- -
- -
- -
Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -
Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency, 2 labs classify as benign/LB in clinvar -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
not provided Benign:3
- -
- -
- -
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis type 4 Benign:2
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
- -
Spinocerebellar ataxia, autosomal recessive, with axonal neuropathy 2 Benign:2
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
- -
Spinocerebellar ataxia, autosomal recessive, with axonal neuropathy 2;C1865409:Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis type 4 Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at