rs9421572

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_005271.5(GLUD1):​c.942A>G​(p.Leu314Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.104 in 1,613,134 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 14,924 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.094 ( 1509 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.11 ( 13415 hom. )

Consequence

GLUD1
NM_005271.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.168

Publications

19 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
GLUD1 (HGNC:4335): (glutamate dehydrogenase 1) This gene encodes glutamate dehydrogenase, which is a mitochondrial matrix enzyme that catalyzes the oxidative deamination of glutamate to alpha-ketoglutarate and ammonia. This enzyme has an important role in regulating amino acid-induced insulin secretion. It is allosterically activated by ADP and inhibited by GTP and ATP. Activating mutations in this gene are a common cause of congenital hyperinsulinism. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. The related glutamate dehydrogenase 2 gene on the human X-chromosome originated from this gene via retrotransposition and encodes a soluble form of glutamate dehydrogenase. Related pseudogenes have been identified on chromosomes 10, 18 and X. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2016]
GLUD1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • hyperinsulinism-hyperammonemia syndrome
    Inheritance: AD, AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, PanelApp Australia

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.55).
BP6
Variant 10-87061032-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-87061032-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 129164.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.168 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.573 is higher than 0.05.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_005271.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
GLUD1
NM_005271.5
MANE Select
c.942A>Gp.Leu314Leu
synonymous
Exon 7 of 13NP_005262.1
GLUD1
NM_001318900.1
c.543A>Gp.Leu181Leu
synonymous
Exon 7 of 13NP_001305829.1
GLUD1
NM_001318901.1
c.441A>Gp.Leu147Leu
synonymous
Exon 10 of 16NP_001305830.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
GLUD1
ENST00000277865.5
TSL:1 MANE Select
c.942A>Gp.Leu314Leu
synonymous
Exon 7 of 13ENSP00000277865.4
GLUD1
ENST00000684338.1
c.942A>Gp.Leu314Leu
synonymous
Exon 7 of 13ENSP00000507457.1
GLUD1
ENST00000681988.1
c.441A>Gp.Leu147Leu
synonymous
Exon 9 of 15ENSP00000507316.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0938
AC:
14264
AN:
152078
Hom.:
1510
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0197
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0164
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0948
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.125
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.590
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0807
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.146
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0570
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0928
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.110
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.124
AC:
31252
AN:
251474
AF XY:
0.122
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0185
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0712
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.113
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.589
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.146
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0922
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.113
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.105
AC:
153756
AN:
1460938
Hom.:
13415
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.104
AC XY:
75703
AN XY:
726832
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0164
AC:
550
AN:
33466
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0761
AC:
3404
AN:
44722
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.119
AC:
3119
AN:
26124
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.592
AC:
23469
AN:
39676
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0664
AC:
5724
AN:
86252
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.146
AC:
7815
AN:
53420
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0444
AC:
256
AN:
5766
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0919
AC:
102124
AN:
1111160
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.121
AC:
7295
AN:
60352
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.481
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
6973
13946
20919
27892
34865
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
3954
7908
11862
15816
19770
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0938
AC:
14272
AN:
152196
Hom.:
1509
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0983
AC XY:
7317
AN XY:
74398
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0196
AC:
814
AN:
41544
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0949
AC:
1450
AN:
15282
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.125
AC:
433
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.590
AC:
3056
AN:
5178
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0812
AC:
391
AN:
4818
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.146
AC:
1545
AN:
10574
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0578
AC:
17
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0928
AC:
6309
AN:
68008
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.114
AC:
242
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
580
1160
1740
2320
2900
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
158
316
474
632
790
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0844
Hom.:
300
Bravo
AF:
0.0905
Asia WGS
AF:
0.290
AC:
1005
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0870
EpiControl
AF:
0.0904

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed.

Oct 23, 2013
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

Hyperinsulinism-hyperammonemia syndrome Benign:3
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Apr 28, 2017
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

not provided Benign:1
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.55
CADD
Benign
8.5
DANN
Benign
0.76
PhyloP100
0.17
Mutation Taster
=94/6
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs9421572; hg19: chr10-88820789; COSMIC: COSV53278976; COSMIC: COSV53278976; API