rs9426
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -18 ACMG points: 0P and 18B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_016579.4(CD320):c.*189G>A variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0596 in 756,224 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3,302 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_016579.4 3_prime_UTR
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- methylmalonic acidemia due to transcobalamin receptor defectInheritance: AR, Unknown Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet, Ambry Genetics, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -18 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_016579.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD320 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.*189G>A | 3_prime_UTR | Exon 5 of 5 | ENSP00000301458.4 | Q9NPF0-1 | |||
| CD320 | TSL:1 | n.*1326G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 5 of 5 | ENSP00000471773.1 | M0R1C4 | |||
| CD320 | TSL:1 | n.*1326G>A | 3_prime_UTR | Exon 5 of 5 | ENSP00000471773.1 | M0R1C4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.114 AC: 17370AN: 152098Hom.: 2020 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0549 AC: 8506AN: 154816 AF XY: 0.0513 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0458 AC: 27681AN: 604008Hom.: 1274 Cov.: 7 AF XY: 0.0433 AC XY: 14097AN XY: 325296 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.114 AC: 17401AN: 152216Hom.: 2028 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.113 AC XY: 8430AN XY: 74428 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at