rs9516905
Variant names:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The NM_001382683.1(MBNL2):c.175-19212C>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.168 in 151,938 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2,305 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.17 ( 2305 hom., cov: 32)
Consequence
MBNL2
NM_001382683.1 intron
NM_001382683.1 intron
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Not reported in ClinVar
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.00100
Publications
2 publications found
Genes affected
MBNL2 (HGNC:16746): (muscleblind like splicing regulator 2) This gene is a member of the muscleblind protein family which was initially described in Drosophila melanogaster. This gene encodes a C3H-type zinc finger protein that modulates alternative splicing of pre-mRNAs. Muscleblind proteins bind specifically to expanded dsCUG RNA but not to normal size CUG repeats and may thereby play a role in the pathophysiology of myotonic dystrophy. Several alternatively spliced transcript variants have been described but the full-length natures of only some have been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2012]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification was made for transcript
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.94).
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.236 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MBNL2 | NM_001382683.1 | c.175-19212C>T | intron_variant | Intron 2 of 8 | ENST00000679496.1 | NP_001369612.1 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MBNL2 | ENST00000679496.1 | c.175-19212C>T | intron_variant | Intron 2 of 8 | NM_001382683.1 | ENSP00000505596.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.168 AC: 25532AN: 151818Hom.: 2293 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
25532
AN:
151818
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
We have no GnomAD4 exomes data on this position. Probably position not covered by the project.
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.168 AC: 25584AN: 151938Hom.: 2305 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.170 AC XY: 12659AN XY: 74258 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
25584
AN:
151938
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
12659
AN XY:
74258
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
AC:
9938
AN:
41404
American (AMR)
AF:
AC:
2877
AN:
15274
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
AC:
514
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
AC:
781
AN:
5174
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
AC:
889
AN:
4812
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
AC:
1876
AN:
10516
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
AC:
38
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
AC:
8253
AN:
67974
Other (OTH)
AF:
AC:
324
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1089
2177
3266
4354
5443
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Age Distribution
Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
274
548
822
1096
1370
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
690
AN:
3464
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
DANN
Benign
PhyloP100
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at
Publications
You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.