rs9578260

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_004004.6(GJB2):​c.-22-12C>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.013 in 1,576,854 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2,205 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.069 ( 1190 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0071 ( 1015 hom. )

Consequence

GJB2
NM_004004.6 intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.00001612
2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.77
Variant links:
Genes affected
GJB2 (HGNC:4284): (gap junction protein beta 2) This gene encodes a member of the gap junction protein family. The gap junctions were first characterized by electron microscopy as regionally specialized structures on plasma membranes of contacting adherent cells. These structures were shown to consist of cell-to-cell channels that facilitate the transfer of ions and small molecules between cells. The gap junction proteins, also known as connexins, purified from fractions of enriched gap junctions from different tissues differ. According to sequence similarities at the nucleotide and amino acid levels, the gap junction proteins are divided into two categories, alpha and beta. Mutations in this gene are responsible for as much as 50% of pre-lingual, recessive deafness. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.81).
BP6
Variant 13-20189615-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-20189615-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 44717.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr13-20189615-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.235 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
GJB2NM_004004.6 linkc.-22-12C>T intron_variant Intron 1 of 1 ENST00000382848.5 NP_003995.2 P29033H9U1J4
GJB2XM_011535049.3 linkc.-22-12C>T intron_variant Intron 1 of 1 XP_011533351.1 P29033H9U1J4

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
GJB2ENST00000382848.5 linkc.-22-12C>T intron_variant Intron 1 of 1 1 NM_004004.6 ENSP00000372299.4 P29033
GJB2ENST00000382844.2 linkc.-34C>T 5_prime_UTR_premature_start_codon_gain_variant Exon 1 of 1 6 ENSP00000372295.1 P29033
GJB2ENST00000382844.2 linkc.-34C>T 5_prime_UTR_variant Exon 1 of 1 6 ENSP00000372295.1 P29033

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0685
AC:
10419
AN:
152046
Hom.:
1177
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.238
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0274
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000576
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000829
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00633
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000794
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0459
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0177
AC:
4413
AN:
248752
Hom.:
437
AF XY:
0.0131
AC XY:
1772
AN XY:
134874
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.238
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0117
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00119
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000327
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000639
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00964
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00708
AC:
10084
AN:
1424690
Hom.:
1015
Cov.:
26
AF XY:
0.00600
AC XY:
4267
AN XY:
710890
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.240
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0136
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00112
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000759
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000433
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000439
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0165
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0688
AC:
10473
AN:
152164
Hom.:
1190
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0662
AC XY:
4925
AN XY:
74426
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.239
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0274
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.000576
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000622
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000794
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0455
Alfa
AF:
0.0529
Hom.:
254
Bravo
AF:
0.0786
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0200
AC:
71
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:13
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:5
May 22, 2024
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 25, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: not provided

- -

Jul 22, 2016
Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 33096615, 30245029, 15070423, 22567369, 25401782) -

not specified Benign:3
Jun 21, 2017
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 27, 2017
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

c.-22-12C>T in Intron 1 of GJB2: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it has been identified in 24% (5729/23952) of African chromo somes by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD; http://gnomad.broadinstitute.o rg; dbSNP rs9578260). ACMG/AMP Criteria applied: BA1 -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 1A Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 16, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Ichthyosis, hystrix-like, with hearing loss Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss Benign:1
Aug 31, 2020
INGEBI, INGEBI / CONICET
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Based on ACMG/AMP guidelines and Hearing Loss Expert Panel specific criteria: the filtering allele frequency of the c.-22-2C>T variant in GJB2 gene is 23,4% in African population (5941/24866 alleles with 95%CI) in Genome Aggregation Database (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org; calculated by using inverse allele frequency at https://www.cardiodb.org/allelefrequencyapp/). This is a high enough frequency, based on the thresholds defined by the ClinGen Hearing Loss Expert Panel, for autosomal recessive hearing loss variants to apply for BA1 rule. This high frequency is also supported by different publications in which controls subjects from different African populations were tested (PS4 not met, PMID: 27501294, 21392827). Benign computational prediction obtained from DANN, CADD and MaxEntScan predictors applying to BP4 rule. In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as benign for autosomal recessive non-syndromic hearing loss (BA1, BP4). -

Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 3A Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.81
CADD
Benign
12
DANN
Benign
0.61

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.000016
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.0020
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs9578260; hg19: chr13-20763754; API