rs9608378
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_004076.5(CRYBB3):c.337C>G(p.His113Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.632 in 1,613,446 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 326,771 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. H113Q) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004076.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- cataract 22 multiple typesInheritance: AR, AD, SD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- early-onset anterior polar cataractInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- early-onset nuclear cataractInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- early-onset non-syndromic cataractInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_004076.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.593 AC: 89958AN: 151826Hom.: 27441 Cov.: 31 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.663 AC: 166523AN: 251290 AF XY: 0.662 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.637 AC: 930251AN: 1461502Hom.: 299314 Cov.: 66 AF XY: 0.638 AC XY: 463490AN XY: 727024 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.592 AC: 90005AN: 151944Hom.: 27457 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.597 AC XY: 44324AN XY: 74246 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at