Menu
GeneBe

rs9619601

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_002473.6(MYH9):c.2256T>C(p.Asn752=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0528 in 1,613,526 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2,449 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.048 ( 177 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.053 ( 2272 hom. )

Consequence

MYH9
NM_002473.6 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.14
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYH9 (HGNC:7579): (myosin heavy chain 9) This gene encodes a conventional non-muscle myosin; this protein should not be confused with the unconventional myosin-9a or 9b (MYO9A or MYO9B). The encoded protein is a myosin IIA heavy chain that contains an IQ domain and a myosin head-like domain which is involved in several important functions, including cytokinesis, cell motility and maintenance of cell shape. Defects in this gene have been associated with non-syndromic sensorineural deafness autosomal dominant type 17, Epstein syndrome, Alport syndrome with macrothrombocytopenia, Sebastian syndrome, Fechtner syndrome and macrothrombocytopenia with progressive sensorineural deafness. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2011]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.64).
BP6
Variant 22-36304129-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr22-36304129-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 44555.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr22-36304129-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=3.14 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.089 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
MYH9NM_002473.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.2256T>C p.Asn752= synonymous_variant 19/41 ENST00000216181.11

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
MYH9ENST00000216181.11 linkuse as main transcriptc.2256T>C p.Asn752= synonymous_variant 19/411 NM_002473.6 P1P35579-1
MYH9ENST00000685801.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.2319T>C p.Asn773= synonymous_variant 20/42
MYH9ENST00000691109.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.2551T>C non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 13/35

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0479
AC:
7285
AN:
152134
Hom.:
178
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0384
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0296
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0221
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0536
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0961
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0691
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0626
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0520
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0468
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0533
AC:
13400
AN:
251216
Hom.:
455
AF XY:
0.0549
AC XY:
7455
AN XY:
135892
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0399
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0197
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0513
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.109
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0633
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0658
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0521
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0451
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0533
AC:
77951
AN:
1461274
Hom.:
2272
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0536
AC XY:
38974
AN XY:
726928
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0367
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0197
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0533
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0990
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0628
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0655
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0524
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0526
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0478
AC:
7282
AN:
152252
Hom.:
177
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0477
AC XY:
3553
AN XY:
74452
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0383
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0221
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0536
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.0960
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0684
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0626
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0520
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0478
Alfa
AF:
0.0490
Hom.:
244
Bravo
AF:
0.0439
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0930
AC:
323
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0483
EpiControl
AF:
0.0494

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMay 07, 2012Asn752Asn in Exon 19 of MYH9: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located within the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 4.6% (322/7020) of Eu ropean American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencin g Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs9619601). -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxAug 03, 2017This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 17 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
MYH9-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.64
Cadd
Benign
7.3
Dann
Benign
0.82

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs9619601; hg19: chr22-36700175; COSMIC: COSV53386660; COSMIC: COSV53386660; API