rs966365
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points: 2P and 20B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_145861.4(EDARADD):c.27G>A(p.Met9Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.837 in 1,613,834 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 569,226 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_145861.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDARADD | NM_145861.4 | c.27G>A | p.Met9Ile | missense_variant | 1/6 | ENST00000334232.9 | NP_665860.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDARADD | ENST00000334232.9 | c.27G>A | p.Met9Ile | missense_variant | 1/6 | 1 | NM_145861.4 | ENSP00000335076 | ||
EDARADD | ENST00000439430.5 | c.-5-14745G>A | intron_variant | 3 | ENSP00000405815 | |||||
EDARADD | ENST00000637660.1 | c.-5-14745G>A | intron_variant | 5 | ENSP00000490347 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.766 AC: 116539AN: 152054Hom.: 46074 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.841 AC: 211467AN: 251440Hom.: 90008 AF XY: 0.848 AC XY: 115210AN XY: 135886
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.844 AC: 1233814AN: 1461662Hom.: 523143 Cov.: 50 AF XY: 0.847 AC XY: 615718AN XY: 727138
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.766 AC: 116587AN: 152172Hom.: 46083 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.772 AC XY: 57396AN XY: 74376
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 29, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Hypohidrotic Ectodermal Dysplasia, Recessive Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
Ectodermal dysplasia 11B, hypohidrotic/hair/tooth type, autosomal recessive;C3541517:Ectodermal dysplasia 11A, hypohidrotic/hair/tooth type, autosomal dominant Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Ectodermal dysplasia 11B, hypohidrotic/hair/tooth type, autosomal recessive Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 30, 2021 | - - |
Hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Ectodermal dysplasia 11A, hypohidrotic/hair/tooth type, autosomal dominant Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 30, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at