rs966955210
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_ModerateBP6_Moderate
The NM_001160036.2(RHOBTB2):c.38A>G(p.Lys13Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000357 in 1,399,180 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/18 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001160036.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001160036.2. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RHOBTB2 | NM_001160036.2 | c.38A>G | p.Lys13Arg | missense | Exon 3 of 12 | NP_001153508.1 | Q9BYZ6-2 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RHOBTB2 | ENST00000519685.5 | TSL:1 | c.38A>G | p.Lys13Arg | missense | Exon 3 of 12 | ENSP00000427926.1 | Q9BYZ6-2 | |
| RHOBTB2 | ENST00000524077.5 | TSL:3 | c.38A>G | p.Lys13Arg | missense | Exon 3 of 6 | ENSP00000430785.1 | E5RI44 | |
| RHOBTB2 | ENST00000867414.1 | c.-29A>G | 5_prime_UTR | Exon 2 of 11 | ENSP00000537473.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000357 AC: 5AN: 1399180Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00000290 AC XY: 2AN XY: 690112 show subpopulations ⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at