rs9672065
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_022489.4(INF2):c.3478G>A(p.Gly1160Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00387 in 1,612,556 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 150 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_022489.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INF2 | NM_022489.4 | c.3478G>A | p.Gly1160Ser | missense_variant | 21/23 | ENST00000392634.9 | |
INF2 | NM_001031714.4 | c.3478G>A | p.Gly1160Ser | missense_variant | 21/22 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INF2 | ENST00000392634.9 | c.3478G>A | p.Gly1160Ser | missense_variant | 21/23 | 5 | NM_022489.4 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0178 AC: 2702AN: 152190Hom.: 65 Cov.: 34
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00478 AC: 1179AN: 246410Hom.: 29 AF XY: 0.00371 AC XY: 499AN XY: 134518
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00243 AC: 3542AN: 1460248Hom.: 85 Cov.: 37 AF XY: 0.00213 AC XY: 1546AN XY: 726406
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0178 AC: 2704AN: 152308Hom.: 65 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.0167 AC XY: 1241AN XY: 74476
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Sep 13, 2022 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | May 17, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Feb 02, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis 5;C4302667:Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease dominant intermediate E Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 30, 2024 | - - |
Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis 5 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children | Sep 04, 2020 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at