rs9727773

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -18 ACMG points: 0P and 18B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_013296.5(GPSM2):c.278+5T>C variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00541 in 1,562,598 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 383 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.028 ( 215 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0029 ( 168 hom. )

Consequence

GPSM2
NM_013296.5 splice_region, intron

Scores

Splicing: ADA: 0.004009

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.160

Publications

1 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

GPSM2 (HGNC:29501): (G protein signaling modulator 2) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to a family of proteins that modulate activation of G proteins, which transduce extracellular signals received by cell surface receptors into integrated cellular responses. The N-terminal half of this protein contains 10 copies of leu-gly-asn (LGN) repeat, and the C-terminal half contains 4 GoLoco motifs, which are involved in guanine nucleotide exchange. This protein may play a role in neuroblast division and in the development of normal hearing. Mutations in this gene are associated with autosomal recessive nonsyndromic deafness (DFNB82). Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2016]

GPSM2 links:

CLCC1 (HGNC:29675): (chloride channel CLIC like 1) Predicted to enable chloride channel activity. Predicted to be involved in chloride transport. Located in endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria-associated endoplasmic reticulum membrane. Implicated in retinitis pigmentosa 32. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]

CLCC1 links:

AKNAD1 (HGNC:28398): (AKNA domain containing 1) This gene encodes a protein which contains a domain found in an AT-hook-containing transcription factor. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, May 2012]

AKNAD1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -18 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.43).

BP6

Variant 1-108897090-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-108897090-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 45567.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BA1

GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0951 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
GPSM2	NM_013296.5 link	c.278+5T>C		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 3 of 14	ENST00000264126.9	NP_037428.3

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
GPSM2	ENST00000264126.9 link	c.278+5T>C		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 3 of 14	1	NM_013296.5	ENSP00000264126.3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0283

AC:

4306

AN:

152210

Hom.:

216

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0979

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0102

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00160

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.0127

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000500

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.0172

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00794

AC:

1982

AN:

249544

AF XY:

0.00589

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.103

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00640

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00143

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000383

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00460

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00294

AC:

4140

AN:

1410270

Hom.:

168

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00249

AC XY:

1758

AN XY:

704678

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0975

AC:

3161

AN:

32430

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00665

AC:

297

AN:

44662

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.0000387

AC:

AN:

25822

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39472

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000117

AC:

AN:

85140

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.000957

AC:

AN:

53298

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00444

AC:

AN:

4508

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000236

AC:

252

AN:

1066356

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00594

AC:

348

AN:

58582

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.491

Heterozygous variant carriers

207

413

620

826

1033

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

184

276

368

460

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0283

AC:

4306

AN:

152328

Hom.:

215

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0269

AC XY:

2002

AN XY:

74496

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0976

AC:

4059

AN:

41572

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0101

AC:

155

AN:

15304

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5188

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000207

AC:

AN:

4830

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00160

AC:

AN:

10620

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.0136

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000500

AC:

AN:

68024

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0170

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.501

Heterozygous variant carriers

203

407

610

814

1017

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

132

176

220

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.0134

Hom.:

130

Bravo

AF:

0.0322

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00462

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000654

EpiControl

AF:

0.000296

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:6

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:3

May 24, 2018

Athena Diagnostics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 28, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:not provided

not specified

Benign:2

Mar 14, 2016

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

May 07, 2012

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

278+5T>C in Intron 03 of GPSM2: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it has been identified in 10.3% (384/3738) of African America n chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (htt p://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs9727773).

Chudley-McCullough syndrome

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.43

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.81

PhyloP100

0.16

PromoterAI

0.041

Neutral

(source)

Mutation Taster

=92/8

polymorphism (auto)

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

dbscSNV1_ADA

Benign

0.0040

dbscSNV1_RF

Benign

0.062

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over