rs985937027
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points: 2P and 3B. PM2BP4_ModerateBP6
The NM_000455.5(STK11):c.1145A>G(p.Gln382Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000124 in 1,611,206 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000455.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STK11 | NM_000455.5 | c.1145A>G | p.Gln382Arg | missense_variant | 9/10 | ENST00000326873.12 | NP_000446.1 | |
STK11 | NR_176325.1 | n.2412A>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 10/11 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STK11 | ENST00000326873.12 | c.1145A>G | p.Gln382Arg | missense_variant | 9/10 | 1 | NM_000455.5 | ENSP00000324856.6 | ||
STK11 | ENST00000585748.3 | c.773A>G | p.Gln258Arg | missense_variant | 11/12 | 3 | ENSP00000477641.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152204Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.85e-7 AC: 1AN: 1459002Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 725716
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152204Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000134 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74362
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Peutz-Jeghers syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Oct 05, 2023 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 15, 2021 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Mar 14, 2019 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jan 16, 2024 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Familial ovarian cancer Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The STK11 p.Gln382Arg variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the LOVD-3.0 database. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs985937027) as “NA” and Clinvar (classified as uncertain significance by Invitae). The variant was identified in control databases in 1 of 30914 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00003 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017); it was observed in the following European Non-Finnish population in 1 of 14982 chromosomes (freq: 0.00007), while it was not observed in the African, Other, Latino, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, European Finnish, or South Asian populations. The p.Gln382 residue is conserved in mammals and four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood that the Arg variant impacts the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at