1-109603491-G-A
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP6BS1
The NM_001377295.2(GNAT2):c.928C>T(p.Leu310Phe) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000203 in 1,609,622 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00018 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00020 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
GNAT2
NM_001377295.2 missense
NM_001377295.2 missense
Scores
7
10
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 4.26
Genes affected
GNAT2 (HGNC:4394): (G protein subunit alpha transducin 2) Transducin is a 3-subunit guanine nucleotide-binding protein (G protein) which stimulates the coupling of rhodopsin and cGMP-phoshodiesterase during visual impulses. The transducin alpha subunits in rods and cones are encoded by separate genes. This gene encodes the alpha subunit in cones. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP6
Variant 1-109603491-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-109603491-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 291718.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Uncertain_significance=1}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000184 (28/152160) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.000458 (7/15282). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000215. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 15 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GNAT2 | NM_001377295.2 | c.928C>T | p.Leu310Phe | missense_variant | 9/9 | ENST00000679935.1 | |
GNAT2 | NM_001379232.1 | c.928C>T | p.Leu310Phe | missense_variant | 9/9 | ||
GNAT2 | NM_005272.5 | c.928C>T | p.Leu310Phe | missense_variant | 8/8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GNAT2 | ENST00000679935.1 | c.928C>T | p.Leu310Phe | missense_variant | 9/9 | NM_001377295.2 | P1 | ||
GNAT2 | ENST00000351050.8 | c.928C>T | p.Leu310Phe | missense_variant | 8/8 | 1 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000184 AC: 28AN: 152160Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
28
AN:
152160
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000227 AC: 57AN: 251372Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000228 AC XY: 31AN XY: 135852
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
57
AN:
251372
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
31
AN XY:
135852
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000204 AC: 298AN: 1457462Hom.: 0 Cov.: 28 AF XY: 0.000211 AC XY: 153AN XY: 725414
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
298
AN:
1457462
Hom.:
Cov.:
28
AF XY:
AC XY:
153
AN XY:
725414
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000184 AC: 28AN: 152160Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000202 AC XY: 15AN XY: 74346
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
28
AN:
152160
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
15
AN XY:
74346
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ExAC
AF:
AC:
30
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Achromatopsia 4 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 06, 2023 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
CADD
Uncertain
DANN
Pathogenic
DEOGEN2
Pathogenic
D
Eigen
Pathogenic
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Pathogenic
D
M_CAP
Uncertain
D
MetaRNN
Uncertain
D
MetaSVM
Uncertain
D
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
H
MutationTaster
Benign
D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
D
REVEL
Pathogenic
Sift
Uncertain
D
Sift4G
Uncertain
D
Polyphen
D
Vest4
MutPred
Gain of ubiquitination at K314 (P = 0.102);
MVP
MPC
ClinPred
D
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at