1-11501635-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2
The NM_020780.2(DISP3):c.643G>T(p.Ala215Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00054 in 1,608,942 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_020780.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DISP3 | NM_020780.2 | c.643G>T | p.Ala215Ser | missense_variant | 2/21 | ENST00000294484.7 | NP_065831.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DISP3 | ENST00000294484.7 | c.643G>T | p.Ala215Ser | missense_variant | 2/21 | 1 | NM_020780.2 | ENSP00000294484.6 | ||
ENSG00000285833 | ENST00000649975.1 | n.382C>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 1/2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00271 AC: 412AN: 152238Hom.: 2 Cov.: 34
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000599 AC: 141AN: 235476Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000517 AC XY: 67AN XY: 129480
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000312 AC: 455AN: 1456586Hom.: 3 Cov.: 36 AF XY: 0.000293 AC XY: 212AN XY: 724066
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00272 AC: 414AN: 152356Hom.: 2 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00260 AC XY: 194AN XY: 74500
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 31, 2019 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at