1-152303083-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_002016.2(FLG):āc.11803T>Cā(p.Ser3935Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0183 in 1,614,054 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4,622 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ). Another nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as Likely benignin UniProt.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002016.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLG | NM_002016.2 | c.11803T>C | p.Ser3935Pro | missense_variant | 3/3 | ENST00000368799.2 | NP_002007.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLG | ENST00000368799.2 | c.11803T>C | p.Ser3935Pro | missense_variant | 3/3 | 1 | NM_002016.2 | ENSP00000357789.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0980 AC: 14899AN: 152052Hom.: 2488 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0255 AC: 6424AN: 251476Hom.: 1012 AF XY: 0.0189 AC XY: 2571AN XY: 135914
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00998 AC: 14594AN: 1461884Hom.: 2130 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00847 AC XY: 6158AN XY: 727246
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0981 AC: 14933AN: 152170Hom.: 2492 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0947 AC XY: 7047AN XY: 74402
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jul 09, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at