1-228735836-G-A
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP4_Moderate
The NM_021205.6(RHOU):c.94G>A(p.Gly32Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Genomes: not found (cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0 ( 0 hom. )
Failed GnomAD Quality Control
Consequence
RHOU
NM_021205.6 missense
NM_021205.6 missense
Scores
1
2
15
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -1.01
Genes affected
RHOU (HGNC:17794): (ras homolog family member U) This gene encodes a member of the Rho family of GTPases. This protein can activate PAK1 and JNK1, and can induce filopodium formation and stress fiber dissolution. It may also mediate the effects of WNT1 signaling in the regulation of cell morphology, cytoskeletal organization, and cell proliferation. A non-coding transcript variant of this gene results from naturally occurring read-through transcription between this locus and the neighboring DUSP5P (dual specificity phosphatase 5 pseudogene) locus.[provided by RefSeq, Mar 2011]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.08123213).
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RHOU | NM_021205.6 | c.94G>A | p.Gly32Arg | missense_variant | 1/3 | ENST00000366691.4 | NP_067028.1 | |
RHOU | NR_037962.1 | n.387-1837G>A | intron_variant |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RHOU | ENST00000366691.4 | c.94G>A | p.Gly32Arg | missense_variant | 1/3 | 1 | NM_021205.6 | ENSP00000355652.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
32
GnomAD4 exome Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0 AF: 0.00 AC: 0AN: 1087496Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 516928
GnomAD4 exome
Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
1087496
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
516928
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
32
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jun 22, 2021 | The c.94G>A (p.G32R) alteration is located in exon 1 (coding exon 1) of the RHOU gene. This alteration results from a G to A substitution at nucleotide position 94, causing the glycine (G) at amino acid position 32 to be replaced by an arginine (R). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Benign
T
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Benign
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
N
M_CAP
Benign
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
N
PrimateAI
Pathogenic
D
PROVEAN
Benign
N
REVEL
Benign
Sift
Benign
D
Sift4G
Uncertain
D
Polyphen
B
Vest4
MutPred
Gain of methylation at G32 (P = 0.0024);
MVP
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at