1-43442849-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 3 ACMG points: 3P and 0B. PM2PP2
The NM_001365999.1(SZT2):āc.8182G>Cā(p.Glu2728Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000274 in 1,458,768 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (ā ). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. E2728E) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001365999.1 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SZT2 | NM_001365999.1 | c.8182G>C | p.Glu2728Gln | missense_variant | 59/72 | ENST00000634258.3 | NP_001352928.1 | |
SZT2 | NM_015284.4 | c.8011G>C | p.Glu2671Gln | missense_variant | 58/71 | NP_056099.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SZT2 | ENST00000634258.3 | c.8182G>C | p.Glu2728Gln | missense_variant | 59/72 | 5 | NM_001365999.1 | ENSP00000489255.1 | ||
SZT2 | ENST00000562955.2 | c.8011G>C | p.Glu2671Gln | missense_variant | 58/71 | 5 | ENSP00000457168.1 | |||
SZT2 | ENST00000648058.1 | n.4636G>C | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 27/40 | ||||||
SZT2 | ENST00000649403.1 | n.2932G>C | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 24/37 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000274 AC: 4AN: 1458768Hom.: 0 Cov.: 36 AF XY: 0.00000276 AC XY: 2AN XY: 725484
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Nov 28, 2016 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at