1-68429265-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBS1_SupportingBS2
The NM_000329.3(RPE65):c.*511G>A variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00228 in 157,300 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0023 ( 2 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00039 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
RPE65
NM_000329.3 3_prime_UTR
NM_000329.3 3_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.148
Genes affected
RPE65 (HGNC:10294): (retinoid isomerohydrolase RPE65) The protein encoded by this gene is a component of the vitamin A visual cycle of the retina which supplies the 11-cis retinal chromophore of the photoreceptors opsin visual pigments. It is a member of the carotenoid cleavage oxygenase superfamily. All members of this superfamily are non-heme iron oxygenases with a seven-bladed propeller fold and oxidatively cleave carotenoid carbon:carbon double bonds. However, the protein encoded by this gene has acquired a divergent function that involves the concerted O-alkyl ester cleavage of its all-trans retinyl ester substrate and all-trans to 11-cis double bond isomerization of the retinyl moiety. As such, it performs the essential enzymatic isomerization step in the synthesis of 11-cis retinal. Mutations in this gene are associated with early-onset severe blinding disorders such as Leber congenital. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2017]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.85).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00234 (356/152154) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.008 (332/41514). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00729. There are 2 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 165 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPE65 | NM_000329.3 | c.*511G>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 14/14 | ENST00000262340.6 | NP_000320.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPE65 | ENST00000262340 | c.*511G>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 14/14 | 1 | NM_000329.3 | ENSP00000262340.5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00233 AC: 355AN: 152036Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
355
AN:
152036
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000389 AC: 2AN: 5146Hom.: 0 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.000709 AC XY: 2AN XY: 2822
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
2
AN:
5146
Hom.:
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
2822
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00234 AC: 356AN: 152154Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00222 AC XY: 165AN XY: 74400
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
356
AN:
152154
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
165
AN XY:
74400
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
3
AN:
3470
ClinVar
Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Leber congenital amaurosis 2 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Retinitis pigmentosa Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at