Variant 10-180040-G-A details in Genebe, Genetics Data Aggregator

Variant summary

Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 2 ACMG points: 3P and 1B. PM2PP2BP4

The NM_001370100.5(ZMYND11):c.28G>A(p.Ala10Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000657 in 152,122 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0000066 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Consequence

ZMYND11
NM_001370100.5 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 7.59

Variant links:

Genes affected

ZMYND11 (HGNC:16966): (zinc finger MYND-type containing 11) The protein encoded by this gene was first identified by its ability to bind the adenovirus E1A protein. The protein localizes to the nucleus. It functions as a transcriptional repressor, and expression of E1A inhibits this repression. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been identified. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

ZMYND11 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 2 ACMG points.

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

PP2

Missense variant in gene, where missense usually causes diseases (based on misZ statistic), ZMYND11. . Gene score misZ: 3.7109 (greater than the threshold 3.09). Trascript score misZ: 4.725 (greater than threshold 3.09). The gene has 14 curated pathogenic missense variants (we use a threshold of 10). The gene has 21 curated benign missense variants. GenCC has associacion of the gene with intellectual disability, autosomal dominant 40, syndromic complex neurodevelopmental disorder, autosomal dominant non-syndromic intellectual disability, intellectual disability, autosomal dominant 30.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.3599303).

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
ZMYND11	NM_001370100.5 link	c.28G>A	p.Ala10Thr	missense_variant	2/15	ENST00000381604.9	NP_001357029.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
ZMYND11	ENST00000381604.9 link	c.28G>A	p.Ala10Thr	missense_variant	2/15	5	NM_001370100.5	ENSP00000371017.6		Q15326-1A0A0A0MRY2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00000657

AC:

AN:

152122

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

Cov.:

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00000657

AC:

AN:

152122

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00

AC XY:

AN XY:

74312

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Bravo

AF:

0.00000378

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000140

AC:

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1

Revision: criteria provided, single submitter

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

GeneDx

Aug 03, 2017

The A10T variant has not been published as a pathogenic variant, nor has it been reported as a benign variant to our knowledge. The A10T variant is not observed in large population cohorts (Lek et al., 2016; 1000 Genomes Consortium et al., 2015; Exome Variant Server). The A10T variant is a non-conservative amino acid substitution, which is likely to impact secondary protein structure as these residues differ in polarity, charge, size and/or other properties. This substitution occurs at a position that is conserved across species. In silico analysis is inconsistent in its predictions as to whether or not the variant is damaging to the protein structure/function. Therefore, based on the currently available information, it is unclear whether this variant is a pathogenic variant or a rare benign variant. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Pathogenic

0.84

BayesDel_addAF

Uncertain

0.12

BayesDel_noAF

Uncertain

-0.060

CADD

Uncertain

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.023

T;T;.;T;.;T;.;.;T;.;.;.

Eigen

Benign

0.14

Eigen_PC

Uncertain

0.36

FATHMM_MKL

Pathogenic

0.98

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.94

D;.;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;.;D;D

M_CAP

Benign

0.0062

MetaRNN

Benign

0.36

T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.78

MutationAssessor

Benign

0.14

.;N;N;.;N;N;.;N;.;N;.;N

PrimateAI

Pathogenic

0.83

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.1

N;N;N;.;N;N;N;.;N;.;N;N

REVEL

Benign

0.25

Sift

Benign

0.28

T;T;T;.;T;T;T;.;T;.;T;T

Sift4G

Uncertain

0.017

D;T;T;T;D;T;T;T;T;T;D;D

Polyphen

0.0020, 0.061

.;.;.;B;.;.;.;.;B;.;.;.

Vest4

0.30, 0.53, 0.58, 0.51, 0.27, 0.50, 0.52, 0.50, 0.51, 0.59

MVP

0.60

MPC

1.4

ClinPred

0.79

GERP RS

6.0

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Varity_R

0.10

gMVP

0.96

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over