10-26145526-G-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_017433.5(MYO3A):​c.2497G>T​(p.Ala833Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0765 in 1,591,708 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5,298 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. A833P) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.061 ( 368 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.078 ( 4930 hom. )

Consequence

MYO3A
NM_017433.5 missense

Scores

6
8
4

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 10.0

Publications

20 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYO3A (HGNC:7601): (myosin IIIA) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the myosin superfamily. Myosins are actin-dependent motor proteins and are categorized into conventional myosins (class II) and unconventional myosins (classes I and III through XV) based on their variable C-terminal cargo-binding domains. Class III myosins, such as this one, have a kinase domain N-terminal to the conserved N-terminal motor domains and are expressed in photoreceptors. The protein encoded by this gene plays an important role in hearing in humans. Three different recessive, loss of function mutations in the encoded protein have been shown to cause nonsyndromic progressive hearing loss. Expression of this gene is highly restricted, with the strongest expression in retina and cochlea. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
MYO3A Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 30
    Inheritance: AR, SD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia, Ambry Genetics
  • nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • hearing loss, autosomal dominant 90
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
  • hearing loss, autosomal recessive
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.010160327).
BP6
Variant 10-26145526-G-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-26145526-G-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 45803.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0866 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
MYO3ANM_017433.5 linkc.2497G>T p.Ala833Ser missense_variant Exon 22 of 35 ENST00000642920.2 NP_059129.3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MYO3AENST00000642920.2 linkc.2497G>T p.Ala833Ser missense_variant Exon 22 of 35 NM_017433.5 ENSP00000495965.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0611
AC:
9295
AN:
152096
Hom.:
368
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0178
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0263
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0744
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0975
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000963
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0276
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0689
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0791
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0885
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0700
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0637
AC:
15940
AN:
250250
AF XY:
0.0646
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0178
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0502
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0926
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000600
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0697
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0894
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0773
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0781
AC:
112399
AN:
1439494
Hom.:
4930
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.0770
AC XY:
55262
AN XY:
717456
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0160
AC:
527
AN:
32988
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0527
AC:
2356
AN:
44688
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0912
AC:
2370
AN:
26000
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000303
AC:
12
AN:
39556
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0308
AC:
2641
AN:
85784
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0725
AC:
3871
AN:
53370
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0451
AC:
258
AN:
5716
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0878
AC:
95893
AN:
1091686
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0749
AC:
4471
AN:
59706
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.452
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
4845
9690
14536
19381
24226
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
3316
6632
9948
13264
16580
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0610
AC:
9291
AN:
152214
Hom.:
368
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0597
AC XY:
4444
AN XY:
74414
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0177
AC:
737
AN:
41542
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0744
AC:
1138
AN:
15294
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0975
AC:
338
AN:
3466
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000965
AC:
5
AN:
5182
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0274
AC:
132
AN:
4814
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0689
AC:
730
AN:
10598
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0782
AC:
23
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0885
AC:
6016
AN:
68004
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0702
AC:
148
AN:
2108
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
456
912
1368
1824
2280
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
108
216
324
432
540
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0785
Hom.:
1979
Bravo
AF:
0.0606
TwinsUK
AF:
0.0863
AC:
320
ALSPAC
AF:
0.0926
AC:
357
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0204
AC:
90
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.0933
AC:
802
ExAC
AF:
0.0638
AC:
7743
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0300
AC:
107
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0893
EpiControl
AF:
0.0962

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Aug 03, 2017
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

May 07, 2012
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Ala833Ser in Exon 22 of MYO3A: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it has been identified in 9.0% (631/7020) of European American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http ://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs33947968). -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 30 Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Sep 05, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
Jan 29, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.21
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.17
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.060
CADD
Pathogenic
28
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.72
D;D
Eigen
Pathogenic
1.1
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
1.0
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.99
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.92
.;D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.010
T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
-0.18
T
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
3.4
M;M
PhyloP100
10
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.63
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-3.0
.;D
REVEL
Pathogenic
0.73
Sift
Pathogenic
0.0
.;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.0070
.;D
Polyphen
1.0
D;D
Vest4
0.33
MPC
0.37
ClinPred
0.061
T
GERP RS
5.7
Varity_R
0.89
gMVP
0.52
Mutation Taster
=26/74
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs33947968; hg19: chr10-26434455; API