10-26560760-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_019043.4(APBB1IP):c.1285C>T(p.Arg429Trp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000883 in 1,602,038 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R429Q) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_019043.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APBB1IP | NM_019043.4 | c.1285C>T | p.Arg429Trp | missense_variant | 13/15 | ENST00000376236.9 | |
APBB1IP | XM_011519514.3 | c.1141C>T | p.Arg381Trp | missense_variant | 12/14 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APBB1IP | ENST00000376236.9 | c.1285C>T | p.Arg429Trp | missense_variant | 13/15 | 5 | NM_019043.4 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00469 AC: 708AN: 151108Hom.: 4 Cov.: 30
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00126 AC: 310AN: 246168Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000914 AC XY: 122AN XY: 133436
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000487 AC: 706AN: 1450812Hom.: 2 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000442 AC XY: 319AN XY: 722322
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00468 AC: 708AN: 151226Hom.: 4 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00440 AC XY: 325AN XY: 73820
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Oct 24, 2017 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at