10-70435399-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points: 1P and 6B. PP3BP4BS1_SupportingBS2

The NM_018055.5(NODAL):c.778G>A(p.Gly260Arg) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000706 in 1,614,028 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another nucleotide change resulting in the same amino acid substitution has been previously reported as Uncertain significance in ClinVar.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000053 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000073 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

NODAL
NM_018055.5 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications P:5U:5B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.73

Publications

6 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

NODAL (HGNC:7865): (nodal growth differentiation factor) This gene encodes a secreted ligand of the TGF-beta (transforming growth factor-beta) superfamily of proteins. Ligands of this family bind various TGF-beta receptors leading to recruitment and activation of SMAD family transcription factors that regulate gene expression. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate the mature protein, which regulates early embryonic development. This protein is required for maintenance of human embryonic stem cell pluripotency and may play a role in human placental development. Mutations in this gene are associated with heterotaxy, a condition characterized by random orientation of visceral organs with respect to the left-right axis. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]

NODAL Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

heterotaxy, visceral, 5, autosomal
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
situs inversus
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

NODAL links:

ENSG00000280401 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000280401 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points.

PP3

Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect 10: AlphaMissense, BayesDel_noAF, Cadd, Dann, Eigen, M_CAP, MutationAssessor, PROVEAN, REVEL, REVEL [when BayesDel_addAF, max_spliceai, FATHMM_MKL, MetaRNN, MutationTaster was below the threshold]

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.30680725).

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. GnomAdExome4 allele frequency = 0.0000725 (106/1461886) while in subpopulation AMR AF = 0.00199 (89/44724). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00166. There are 1 homozygotes in GnomAdExome4. There are 43 alleles in the male GnomAdExome4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 29. This position passed quality control check. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 8 AD gene.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_018055.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Sel.	Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
	NODAL	NM_018055.5	MANE Select	c.778G>A	p.Gly260Arg	missense	Exon 2 of 3	NP_060525.3
	NODAL	NM_001329906.2		c.379G>A	p.Gly127Arg	missense	Exon 2 of 3	NP_001316835.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
NODAL	ENST00000287139.8	TSL:1 MANE Select	c.778G>A	p.Gly260Arg	missense	Exon 2 of 3	ENSP00000287139.3	Q96S42
NODAL	ENST00000414871.1	TSL:1	c.613G>A	p.Gly205Arg	missense	Exon 2 of 3	ENSP00000394468.1	H7C0E4
ENSG00000280401	ENST00000624563.1	TSL:6	n.571C>T		non_coding_transcript_exon	Exon 1 of 1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000526

AC:

AN:

152142

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000458

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000310

AC:

AN:

251458

AF XY:

0.000206

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00220

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000879

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000163

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000725

AC:

106

AN:

1461886

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000591

AC XY:

AN XY:

727244

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000299

AC:

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00199

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86258

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53418

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000117

AC:

AN:

1112006

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0000497

AC:

AN:

60396

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.468

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000526

AC:

AN:

152142

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000135

AC XY:

AN XY:

74342

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41420

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000458

AC:

AN:

15268

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5196

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4824

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10626

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000147

AC:

AN:

68018

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2092

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.512

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.0000409

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000155

ExAC

AF:

0.000346

AC:

ClinVar

ClinVar submissions

Significance:Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Revision:criteria provided, conflicting classifications

View on ClinVar

Pathogenic

VUS

Benign

Condition

Heterotaxy, visceral, 5, autosomal (6)

Inborn genetic diseases (1)

NODAL-related disorder (1)

not provided (1)

Visceral heterotaxy (1)

Wolff-Parkinson-White pattern (1)

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Pathogenic

0.85

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

0.0057

BayesDel_noAF

Pathogenic

0.23

CADD

Pathogenic

(source)

DANN

Pathogenic

1.0

DEOGEN2

Pathogenic

0.98

Eigen

Pathogenic

0.84

Eigen_PC

Pathogenic

0.75

FATHMM_MKL

Pathogenic

0.98

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.95

M_CAP

Pathogenic

0.30

MetaRNN

Benign

0.31

MetaSVM

Pathogenic

1.0

MutationAssessor

Pathogenic

2.9

PhyloP100

5.7

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.73

PROVEAN

Pathogenic

-7.3

REVEL

Pathogenic

0.79

Sift

Pathogenic

0.0

Sift4G

Pathogenic

0.0

Polyphen

1.0

Vest4

0.78

MutPred

0.75

Gain of MoRF binding (P = 0.0041)

MVP

0.89

MPC

1.2

ClinPred

0.41

GERP RS

5.0

Varity_R

0.85

gMVP

0.95

Mutation Taster

=67/33

disease causing (ClinVar)

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.010

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Variant Effect in Transcripts

RefSeq Transcripts

Ensembl Transcripts

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over