10-76036105-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. The variant received 6 ACMG points: 6P and 0B. PM2PP3_Strong
The NM_001305581.2(LRMDA):c.229C>G(p.Leu77Val) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000173 in 1,613,964 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. L77L) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001305581.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- oculocutaneous albinism type 7Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_pathogenic. The variant received 6 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001305581.2. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRMDA | TSL:5 MANE Select | c.229C>G | p.Leu77Val | missense | Exon 3 of 7 | ENSP00000480240.1 | A0A087WWI0 | ||
| LRMDA | TSL:1 | c.145C>G | p.Leu49Val | missense | Exon 2 of 6 | ENSP00000361577.1 | Q9H2I8 | ||
| LRMDA | TSL:1 | n.583C>G | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 4 of 8 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152166Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000278 AC: 7AN: 251368 AF XY: 0.0000368 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000164 AC: 24AN: 1461798Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000206 AC XY: 15AN XY: 727200 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152166Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74332 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at