11-108304736-A-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_000051.4(ATM):​c.5558A>T​(p.Asp1853Val) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00484 in 1,614,054 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 27 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. D1853N) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0044 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0049 ( 27 hom. )

Consequence

ATM
NM_000051.4 missense

Scores

4
12
3

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:33O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.47

Publications

75 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
ATM (HGNC:795): (ATM serine/threonine kinase) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the PI3/PI4-kinase family. This protein is an important cell cycle checkpoint kinase that phosphorylates; thus, it functions as a regulator of a wide variety of downstream proteins, including tumor suppressor proteins p53 and BRCA1, checkpoint kinase CHK2, checkpoint proteins RAD17 and RAD9, and DNA repair protein NBS1. This protein and the closely related kinase ATR are thought to be master controllers of cell cycle checkpoint signaling pathways that are required for cell response to DNA damage and for genome stability. Mutations in this gene are associated with ataxia telangiectasia, an autosomal recessive disorder. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2010]
ATM Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • hereditary breast carcinoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, ClinGen
  • ataxia telangiectasia
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, ClinGen, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Orphanet
  • hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE, LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen, Ambry Genetics
  • prostate cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
  • sarcoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • familial ovarian cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
  • gastric carcinoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.016077608).
BP6
Variant 11-108304736-A-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-108304736-A-T is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 133623.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00439 (668/152296) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.00729 (496/68028). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00676. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 311 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 27 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
ATMNM_000051.4 linkc.5558A>T p.Asp1853Val missense_variant Exon 37 of 63 ENST00000675843.1 NP_000042.3 Q13315A0A024R3C7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ATMENST00000675843.1 linkc.5558A>T p.Asp1853Val missense_variant Exon 37 of 63 NM_000051.4 ENSP00000501606.1 Q13315

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00439
AC:
668
AN:
152178
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000821
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00768
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00295
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00720
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000192
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00496
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00292
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00729
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00239
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00488
AC:
1226
AN:
250992
AF XY:
0.00522
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000738
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00295
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00695
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000545
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00370
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00662
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00556
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00489
AC:
7150
AN:
1461758
Hom.:
27
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00494
AC XY:
3592
AN XY:
727184
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000508
AC:
17
AN:
33472
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00315
AC:
141
AN:
44720
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00708
AC:
185
AN:
26134
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000504
AC:
2
AN:
39678
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00579
AC:
499
AN:
86252
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00360
AC:
192
AN:
53402
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00381
AC:
22
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00521
AC:
5789
AN:
1111950
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00502
AC:
303
AN:
60382
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.487
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
398
795
1193
1590
1988
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
176
352
528
704
880
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00439
AC:
668
AN:
152296
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00418
AC XY:
311
AN XY:
74468
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000818
AC:
34
AN:
41544
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00294
AC:
45
AN:
15294
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00720
AC:
25
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000193
AC:
1
AN:
5188
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00497
AC:
24
AN:
4830
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00292
AC:
31
AN:
10618
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00729
AC:
496
AN:
68028
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00236
AC:
5
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.499
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
36
72
108
144
180
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00653
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00389
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00539
AC:
20
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00337
AC:
13
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000909
AC:
4
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00686
AC:
59
ExAC
AF:
0.00516
AC:
627
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00231
AC:
8
AN:
3476
EpiCase
AF:
0.00698
EpiControl
AF:
0.00670

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:33Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Ataxia-telangiectasia syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:7
May 18, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 21, 2018
Counsyl
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com. -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 22, 2016
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

May 28, 2019
Mendelics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 09, 2019
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:7Other:1
Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 19, 2013
ITMI
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:reference population

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 28, 2014
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Jul 30, 2018
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 27, 2016
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:7
Jan 31, 2023
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 09, 2019
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

ATM: BP4, BS2 -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 07, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:6
Nov 14, 2017
True Health Diagnostics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 01, 2014
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Sep 15, 2021
Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 17, 2020
Spanish ATM Cancer Susceptibility Variant Interpretation Working Group
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

The c.5558A>T (p.Asp1853Val) missense variant has an allele frequency of 0.48%, (1282/267,858 alleles) in the gnomAD v2.1.1 non-cancer dataset, with a maximal frequency of 0.67%, (797/117,840 alleles) in the European (non-Finnish) subpopulation (BA1; http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). Therefore, it meets criteria to be classified as benign. Adapted ACMG/AMP rules applied as defined by the Spanish ATM working group: BA1 (PMID: 33280026). -

Sep 06, 2020
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

- -

Oct 15, 2015
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Familial cancer of breast Benign:2
Jan 01, 2019
Institute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was identified as compound heterozygous. -

May 23, 2024
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. -

Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Nov 25, 2020
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Ataxia-telangiectasia syndrome;C0346153:Familial cancer of breast Benign:1
-
Center for Genomics, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant has been reported in the literature in numerous individuals with a variety of indications, including breast cancer, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, melanoma and common variable immunodeficiency (Teraoka 2001 PMID:11505391, Concannon 2008 PMID:18701470, Navrkalova 2013 PMID:23585524, Maxwell 2016 PMID:27153395, Casula 2019 PMID:31382929, Hargreaves 2021 PMID:34009545). Of note, multiple publications classify this variant as a benign polymorphism. This variant is present in the Genome Aggregation Database (Highest reported MAF 0.6% (881/128846) including 4 homozygotes (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/11-108175463-A-T?dataset=gnomad_r2_1). This variant is present in ClinVar, with several labs classifying this variant as Likely Benign or Benign (Variation ID:133623). Evolutionary conservation and computational predictive tools suggest that this variant may impact the protein. In summary, data on this variant suggests that this variant does not cause disease but requires further evidence. Therefore, this variant is classified as Likely Benign. -

Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
-
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

The ATM p.Asp1853Val variant was identified in 39 of 2578 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.02) from individuals or families with prostate, breast and ovarian cancer and was present in 4 of 880 control chromosomes (frequency: 0.005) from healthy individuals (Angele 2004, Paglia 2010, Johnson 2007, Tapia 2008). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs1801673) as “With Likely benign allele”,ClinVar (classified as benign by Invitae, Ambry Genetics, Color Genomics; classified as likely benign by GeneDx, Prevention Genetics), Cosmic (classified as pathogenic (score 0.97)), MutDB (clasified as polymorphism), LOVD 3.0, databases. The variant was not identified in GeneInsight-COGR, ATM-LOVD, databases. The variant was identified in control databases in 1360 (6 homozygous) of 276730 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.005 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Consortium Feb 27, 2017). The p.Asp1853 residue is conserved in mammals but not in more distantly related organisms, and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) suggest that the variant may impact the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to assume pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. The variant is located with the Armadillo-type fold functional domain increasing the likelihood that it may have clinical significance. The study by Angele (2004) observed no significant differences in the frequency between the cases and controls. However, functional study by Tapia (2008) suggests a possible alteration of normal splicing due to variant affect an ESE sequence. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Apr 19, 2022
National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Uncertain
0.42
BayesDel_addAF
Uncertain
0.024
T
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.27
CADD
Uncertain
25
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.26
T;T
Eigen
Uncertain
0.54
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.57
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.97
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.90
D;.
M_CAP
Pathogenic
0.42
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.016
T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
-0.19
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.5
M;M
PhyloP100
5.5
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.48
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
-4.5
D;D
REVEL
Uncertain
0.59
Sift
Uncertain
0.0060
D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.0070
D;D
Polyphen
0.88
P;P
Vest4
0.67
MVP
0.86
MPC
0.23
ClinPred
0.032
T
GERP RS
5.5
Varity_R
0.61
gMVP
0.58
Mutation Taster
=88/12
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.070
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1801673; hg19: chr11-108175463; COSMIC: COSV53725804; COSMIC: COSV53725804; API