11-31787774-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_019040.5(ELP4):​c.*4250C>T variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.449 in 227,130 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 23,511 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.44 ( 15027 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.47 ( 8484 hom. )

Consequence

ELP4
NM_019040.5 3_prime_UTR

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.302
Variant links:
Genes affected
ELP4 (HGNC:1171): (elongator acetyltransferase complex subunit 4) This gene encodes a component of the six subunit elongator complex, a histone acetyltransferase complex that associates directly with RNA polymerase II during transcriptional elongation. The human gene can partially complement sensitivity phenotypes of yeast ELP4 deletion mutants. This gene has also been associated with Rolandic epilepsy. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2013]
PAX6 (HGNC:8620): (paired box 6) This gene encodes paired box protein Pax-6, one of many human homologs of the Drosophila melanogaster gene prd. In addition to a conserved paired box domain, a hallmark feature of this gene family, the encoded protein also contains a homeobox domain. Both domains are known to bind DNA and function as regulators of gene transcription. Activity of this protein is key in the development of neural tissues, particularly the eye. This gene is regulated by multiple enhancers located up to hundreds of kilobases distant from this locus. Mutations in this gene or in the enhancer regions can cause ocular disorders such as aniridia and Peter's anomaly. Use of alternate promoters and alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms. Interestingly, inclusion of a particular alternate coding exon has been shown to increase the length of the paired box domain and alter its DNA binding specificity. Consequently, isoforms that carry the shorter paired box domain regulate a different set of genes compared to the isoforms carrying the longer paired box domain. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2019]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.81).
BP6
Variant 11-31787774-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-31787774-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 304334.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (SAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.557 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
ELP4NM_019040.5 linkc.*4250C>T 3_prime_UTR_variant 10/10 ENST00000640961.2 NP_061913.3 Q96EB1-1
ELP4NM_001288726.2 linkc.*4345C>T 3_prime_UTR_variant 12/12 NP_001275655.1 Q96EB1G5E9D4
ELP4NM_001288725.2 linkc.*4236C>T 3_prime_UTR_variant 11/11 NP_001275654.1 Q96EB1-3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ELP4ENST00000640961.2 linkc.*4250C>T 3_prime_UTR_variant 10/101 NM_019040.5 ENSP00000492152.1 Q96EB1-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.436
AC:
66328
AN:
152004
Hom.:
15010
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.317
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.441
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.405
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.462
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.454
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.574
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.433
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.402
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.503
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.468
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.473
AC:
35512
AN:
75010
Hom.:
8484
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
0.480
AC XY:
16616
AN XY:
34644
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.315
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.385
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.457
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.457
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.601
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.407
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.496
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.463
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.436
AC:
66366
AN:
152120
Hom.:
15027
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.435
AC XY:
32375
AN XY:
74380
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.316
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.405
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.462
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.455
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.575
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.433
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.503
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.476
Alfa
AF:
0.469
Hom.:
3848
Bravo
AF:
0.424
Asia WGS
AF:
0.496
AC:
1727
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMay 14, 2021- -
carboxymethyl-dextran-A2-gadolinium-DOTA Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Aniridia 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Foveal hypoplasia 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Congenital aniridia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJun 14, 2016- -
11p partial monosomy syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Autosomal dominant keratitis Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Anophthalmia-microphthalmia syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.81
CADD
Benign
3.0
DANN
Benign
0.57

Splicing

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs12421026; hg19: chr11-31809322; API