11-47238926-C-T

Variant names:

• chr11-47238926-C-T
• rs1050244
• NM_000107.3:c.*77C>T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_Strong BP6_Very_Strong BA1

The NM_000107.3(DDB2):​c.*77C>T variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0398 in 1,531,978 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,636 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.034 (122 hom., cov: 31)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.040 (1514 hom.)
• Consequence: DDB2 NM_000107.3 3_prime_UTR
• Clinical Significance: Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:3
• Conservation: PhyloP100: 1.21

Genes affected

DDB2 (HGNC:2718): (damage specific DNA binding protein 2) This gene encodes a protein that is necessary for the repair of ultraviolet light-damaged DNA. This protein is the smaller subunit of a heterodimeric protein complex that participates in nucleotide excision repair, and this complex mediates the ubiquitylation of histones H3 and H4, which facilitates the cellular response to DNA damage. This subunit appears to be required for DNA binding. Mutations in this gene cause xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group E, a recessive disease that is characterized by an increased sensitivity to UV light and a high predisposition for skin cancer development, in some cases accompanied by neurological abnormalities. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2014]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.8).
• BP6: Variant 11-47238926-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-47238926-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 304930.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
• BA1: GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (SAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.11 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
DDB2	NM_000107.3	c.*77C>T		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 10 of 10	ENST00000256996.9	NP_000098.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
DDB2	ENST00000256996.9	c.*77C>T		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 10 of 10	1	NM_000107.3	ENSP00000256996.4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0342 AC: 5179 AN: 151630 Hom.: 124 Cov.: 31

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.0226

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.0230

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.0167

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.0156

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.0428

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.119

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.0468

Gnomad MID AF: 0.0127

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.0377

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.0318

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0405 AC: 55857 AN: 1380230 Hom.: 1514 Cov.: 21 AF XY: 0.0429 AC XY: 29580 AN XY: 689484

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.0230

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.0140

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.0126

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.0352

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.113

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.0499

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.0367

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.0419

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0341 AC: 5176 AN: 151748 Hom.: 122 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0358 AC XY: 2656 AN XY: 74114

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.0227

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.0166

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.0156

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.0421

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.118

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.0468

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.0377

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.0319

Alfa AF: 0.0343 Hom.: 59

Bravo AF: 0.0289

Asia WGS AF: 0.117 AC: 407 AN: 3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:3

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:2

Feb 28, 2019

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Xeroderma pigmentosum, group E Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.80
CADD	Benign	13
DANN	Benign	0.56
RBP_binding_hub_radar		0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar		1.0

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.090		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1050244; hg19: chr11-47260477; COSMIC: COSV104563737; COSMIC: COSV104563737;