chr11-47238926-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_000107.3(DDB2):c.*77C>T variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0398 in 1,531,978 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,636 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.034 ( 122 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.040 ( 1514 hom. )
Consequence
DDB2
NM_000107.3 3_prime_UTR
NM_000107.3 3_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 1.21
Genes affected
DDB2 (HGNC:2718): (damage specific DNA binding protein 2) This gene encodes a protein that is necessary for the repair of ultraviolet light-damaged DNA. This protein is the smaller subunit of a heterodimeric protein complex that participates in nucleotide excision repair, and this complex mediates the ubiquitylation of histones H3 and H4, which facilitates the cellular response to DNA damage. This subunit appears to be required for DNA binding. Mutations in this gene cause xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group E, a recessive disease that is characterized by an increased sensitivity to UV light and a high predisposition for skin cancer development, in some cases accompanied by neurological abnormalities. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2014]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.8).
BP6
Variant 11-47238926-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-47238926-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 304930.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (SAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.11 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDB2 | NM_000107.3 | c.*77C>T | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 10/10 | ENST00000256996.9 | NP_000098.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDB2 | ENST00000256996.9 | c.*77C>T | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 10/10 | 1 | NM_000107.3 | ENSP00000256996.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0342 AC: 5179AN: 151630Hom.: 124 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
5179
AN:
151630
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0405 AC: 55857AN: 1380230Hom.: 1514 Cov.: 21 AF XY: 0.0429 AC XY: 29580AN XY: 689484
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
55857
AN:
1380230
Hom.:
Cov.:
21
AF XY:
AC XY:
29580
AN XY:
689484
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0341 AC: 5176AN: 151748Hom.: 122 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0358 AC XY: 2656AN XY: 74114
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
5176
AN:
151748
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
2656
AN XY:
74114
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
407
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Feb 28, 2019 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Xeroderma pigmentosum, group E Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at