11-61951915-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_004183.4(BEST1):ā€‹c.109T>Cā€‹(p.Leu37Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.391 in 1,613,370 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 145,003 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā˜…ā˜…).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.49 ( 21404 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.38 ( 123599 hom. )

Consequence

BEST1
NM_004183.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:17O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.761
Variant links:
Genes affected
BEST1 (HGNC:12703): (bestrophin 1) This gene encodes a member of the bestrophin gene family. This small gene family is characterized by proteins with a highly conserved N-terminus with four to six transmembrane domains. Bestrophins may form chloride ion channels or may regulate voltage-gated L-type calcium-ion channels. Bestrophins are generally believed to form calcium-activated chloride-ion channels in epithelial cells but they have also been shown to be highly permeable to bicarbonate ion transport in retinal tissue. Mutations in this gene are responsible for juvenile-onset vitelliform macular dystrophy (VMD2), also known as Best macular dystrophy, in addition to adult-onset vitelliform macular dystrophy (AVMD) and other retinopathies. Alternative splicing results in multiple variants encoding distinct isoforms.[provided by RefSeq, Nov 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.42).
BP6
Variant 11-61951915-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-61951915-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 99678.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-61951915-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.761 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.89 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
BEST1NM_004183.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.109T>C p.Leu37Leu synonymous_variant 2/11 ENST00000378043.9 NP_004174.1 O76090-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BEST1ENST00000378043.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.109T>C p.Leu37Leu synonymous_variant 2/111 NM_004183.4 ENSP00000367282.4 O76090-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.492
AC:
74763
AN:
152006
Hom.:
21364
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.732
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.197
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.492
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.279
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.911
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.715
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.461
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.307
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.321
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.416
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.488
AC:
122451
AN:
251064
Hom.:
35490
AF XY:
0.480
AC XY:
65222
AN XY:
135740
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.732
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.623
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.263
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.912
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.702
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.460
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.315
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.410
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.380
AC:
555789
AN:
1461246
Hom.:
123599
Cov.:
49
AF XY:
0.387
AC XY:
281424
AN XY:
726948
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.743
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.609
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.270
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.934
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.694
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.453
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.314
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.415
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.492
AC:
74857
AN:
152124
Hom.:
21404
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.504
AC XY:
37507
AN XY:
74380
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.732
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.493
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.279
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.911
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.714
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.461
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.321
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.416
Alfa
AF:
0.348
Hom.:
22758
Bravo
AF:
0.503
Asia WGS
AF:
0.768
AC:
2668
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.304
EpiControl
AF:
0.299

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:17Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Feb 28, 2017- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
not provided Benign:4Other:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 31, 2024- -
not provided, no classification providedliterature onlyRetina International-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 03, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesNov 29, 2023- -
Autosomal dominant vitreoretinochoroidopathy Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 14, 2021- -
Vitelliform macular dystrophy 2 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 14, 2021- -
Autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 14, 2021- -
Retinitis pigmentosa 50 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 14, 2021- -
Retinal dystrophy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterresearchDept Of Ophthalmology, Nagoya UniversityOct 01, 2023- -
Retinitis pigmentosa Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.42
CADD
Benign
5.9
DANN
Benign
0.60

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1800007; hg19: chr11-61719387; COSMIC: COSV57120859; COSMIC: COSV57120859; API