11-74457316-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2

The NM_005472.5(KCNE3):​c.248G>A​(p.Arg83His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00477 in 1,614,148 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 33 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0038 ( 2 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0049 ( 31 hom. )

Consequence

KCNE3
NM_005472.5 missense

Scores

2
6
11

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:6B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.00
Variant links:
Genes affected
KCNE3 (HGNC:6243): (potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily E regulatory subunit 3) Voltage-gated potassium (Kv) channels represent the most complex class of voltage-gated ion channels from both functional and structural standpoints. Their diverse functions include regulating neurotransmitter release, heart rate, insulin secretion, neuronal excitability, epithelial electrolyte transport, smooth muscle contraction, and cell volume. This gene encodes a member of the potassium channel, voltage-gated, isk-related subfamily. This member is a type I membrane protein, and a beta subunit that assembles with a potassium channel alpha-subunit to modulate the gating kinetics and enhance stability of the multimeric complex. This gene is prominently expressed in the kidney. A missense mutation in this gene is associated with hypokalemic periodic paralysis. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.012397826).
BP6
Variant 11-74457316-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-74457316-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 5541.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=5, Uncertain_significance=4, Benign=5}. Variant chr11-74457316-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr11-74457316-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 580 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
KCNE3NM_005472.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.248G>A p.Arg83His missense_variant 3/3 ENST00000310128.9 NP_005463.1 Q9Y6H6Q6IAE6

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
KCNE3ENST00000310128.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.248G>A p.Arg83His missense_variant 3/31 NM_005472.5 ENSP00000310557.4 Q9Y6H6
KCNE3ENST00000525550.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.248G>A p.Arg83His missense_variant 2/21 ENSP00000433633.1 Q9Y6H6
KCNE3ENST00000532569.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.248G>A p.Arg83His missense_variant 3/34 ENSP00000431739.1 Q2N1I1
ENSG00000254631ENST00000533008.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.155-26861C>T intron_variant 3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00381
AC:
580
AN:
152194
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00135
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00484
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000192
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00217
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00616
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00287
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00300
AC:
753
AN:
251278
Hom.:
7
AF XY:
0.00286
AC XY:
388
AN XY:
135846
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00105
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00243
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000992
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000544
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000359
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00282
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00491
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00326
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00487
AC:
7112
AN:
1461836
Hom.:
31
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.00470
AC XY:
3421
AN XY:
727230
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00116
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00266
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.000344
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000504
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000174
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00296
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00584
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00452
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00381
AC:
580
AN:
152312
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00349
AC XY:
260
AN XY:
74480
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00135
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00483
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00217
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00616
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00284
Alfa
AF:
0.00463
Hom.:
4
Bravo
AF:
0.00362
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00512
AC:
19
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00493
AC:
19
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00182
AC:
8
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00676
AC:
58
ExAC
AF:
0.00296
AC:
359
EpiCase
AF:
0.00485
EpiControl
AF:
0.00409

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:6Benign:12
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:2Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenMay 01, 2023KCNE3: BS1, BS2 -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedliterature onlyOMIMApr 01, 2007- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJul 13, 2018This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: none, 11207363, 11874988, 24055113, 12414843, 14504341, 15037716, 20051516) -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo ClinicJul 15, 2020- -
not specified Uncertain:2Benign:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMar 29, 2016Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Several pubs, including possible segs and functional studies, but frequency is too high for disease and wrong phenotype. ExAC: 0.4% (289/66352) European chromosomes -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingStanford Center for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Stanford UniversityDec 11, 2012Note this variant was found in clinical genetic testing performed by one or more labs who may also submit to ClinVar. Thus any internal case data may overlap with the internal case data of other labs. The interpretation reviewed below is that of the Stanford Center for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease. KCNE3 p.Arg83His Based on the data reviewed below we consider it a variant of uncertain significance, probably benign. The variant has been reported in cases of periodic paralysis (Abbot et al 2001, Dias Da Silva et al 2002, Sterberg et al 2003). However, it was then later found in controls, suggesting it is likely benign and was identified in these cases because it is present in 0.1-1% of all individuals (reviewed in more detail below). Hedley et al (2011) investigated the KCNE genes as putative HCM genes. In their cohort of 93 unrelated HCM patients two individuals had p.Arg83His in KCNE3. However, the authors concluded it was not causative since one of the patients also had a presumed pathogenic TNNT2 variant (specific variant not cited) and because of the prevalence in the general population. In silico analysis with PolyPhen-2 predicts the variant to be benign. The arginine at codon 83 is not conserved across species and in the marmoset is in fact a histidine. The KCNE3 gene has been associated with Brugada syndrome type 6 (Deplon et al 2008) and periodic paralysis (Abbott et al 2001). In total the variant has not been seen with allele frequencies of 0.1-1.1% in individuals in general population samples (rs17215437). Another variant, c.248G>T has been seen with allele frequencies of 0.14-1.52% in 1000 genomes. The variant was recently reported online in 50 of 5379 individuals in the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project dataset (as of December 11th, 2012). The phenotype of those individuals is not publicly available, however the cohorts that were merged to create this dataset were all either general population samples or samples recruited for common cardiovascular disease such as hypertension. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpJan 01, 2024- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Brugada syndrome 6 Uncertain:1Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesOct 03, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 31, 2024- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center UtrechtOct 09, 2014- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCentre for Mendelian Genomics, University Medical Centre LjubljanaJan 01, 2016This variant was classified as: Uncertain significance. -
Syncope;C0042510:Ventricular fibrillation Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCentre for Mendelian Genomics, University Medical Centre LjubljanaJul 03, 2014- -
Periodic paralysis Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterresearchBiesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of HealthJun 24, 2013- -
Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Advanced Laboratory Medicine, UC San Diego Health, University of California San DiegoJan 10, 2019- -
Encephalopathy, neonatal severe, with lactic acidosis and brain abnormalities Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsMay 28, 2019- -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMay 11, 2018This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.091
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.14
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.030
CADD
Uncertain
24
DANN
Uncertain
0.98
DEOGEN2
Pathogenic
0.88
D;D;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.49
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.40
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.69
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.71
.;T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.035
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.012
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.052
D
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.2
M;M;.
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.57
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
-4.4
D;D;D
REVEL
Uncertain
0.58
Sift
Benign
0.044
D;D;D
Sift4G
Benign
0.077
T;T;.
Polyphen
0.0030
B;B;.
Vest4
0.47
MVP
0.93
MPC
0.15
ClinPred
0.027
T
GERP RS
3.4
Varity_R
0.49
gMVP
0.88

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs17215437; hg19: chr11-74168361; API