12-110913117-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_000432.4(MYL2):c.381G>A(p.Ala127Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000938 in 1,614,156 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 20 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. A127A) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0051 ( 10 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00051 ( 10 hom. )

Consequence

MYL2
NM_000432.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:16

Conservation

PhyloP100: -5.02

Publications

1 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

MYL2 (HGNC:7583): (myosin light chain 2) This gene encodes a major sarcomeric protein in mammalian striated muscle. The encoded protein plays a role in embryonic heart muscle structure and function, while phosphorylation of the encoded protein is involved in cardiac myosin cycling kinetics, torsion and function in adults. Mutations in this gene are associated with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 10 and infant-onset myopathy. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]

MYL2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 10
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: ClinGen, G2P, PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
myopathy, myofibrillar, 12, infantile-onset, with cardiomyopathy
Inheritance: AR Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
congenital fiber-type disproportion myopathy
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
dilated cardiomyopathy
Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy
Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

MYL2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.65).

BP6

Variant 12-110913117-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-110913117-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 36646.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-5.02 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00509 (775/152262) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0182 (755/41536). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0171. There are 10 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 337 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 10 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein
MYL2	NM_000432.4 link	c.381G>A	p.Ala127Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 6 of 7	ENST00000228841.15	NP_000423.2
MYL2	NM_001406745.1 link	c.339G>A	p.Ala113Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 5 of 6		NP_001393674.1
MYL2	NM_001406916.1 link	c.324G>A	p.Ala108Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 6 of 7		NP_001393845.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
MYL2	ENST00000228841.15 link	c.381G>A	p.Ala127Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 6 of 7	1	NM_000432.4	ENSP00000228841.8

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00509

AC:

775

AN:

152144

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0182

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000523

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00478

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00120

AC:

301

AN:

251490

AF XY:

0.000861

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0179

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000202

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000506

AC:

739

AN:

1461894

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000433

AC XY:

315

AN XY:

727248

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0199

AC:

667

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000268

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0000252

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000464

AC:

AN:

86258

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53420

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00000540

AC:

AN:

1112012

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000811

AC:

AN:

60396

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.471

Heterozygous variant carriers

105

158

210

263

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

120

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00509

AC:

775

AN:

152262

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00453

AC XY:

337

AN XY:

74454

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0182

AC:

755

AN:

41536

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000523

AC:

AN:

15302

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5182

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4820

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10618

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000294

AC:

AN:

68014

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00473

AC:

AN:

2112

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.505

Heterozygous variant carriers

115

154

192

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00366

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00552

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00144

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:16

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:4

Jun 20, 2008

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 07, 2014

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 10

Benign:3

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Sep 21, 2015

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 02, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:3

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 03, 2015

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:not provided

- -

Cardiomyopathy

Benign:2

Dec 03, 2015

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 08, 2018

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Benign:2

Feb 05, 2024

All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 10, 2022

Cohesion Phenomics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Primary familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Benign:1

Aug 18, 2011

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Jul 15, 2015

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.65

CADD

Benign

0.11

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.64

PhyloP100

-5.0

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over