rs2233261
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_000432.4(MYL2):c.381G>A(p.Ala127=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000938 in 1,614,156 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 20 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0051 ( 10 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00051 ( 10 hom. )
Consequence
MYL2
NM_000432.4 synonymous
NM_000432.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -5.02
Genes affected
MYL2 (HGNC:7583): (myosin light chain 2) This gene encodes a major sarcomeric protein in mammalian striated muscle. The encoded protein plays a role in embryonic heart muscle structure and function, while phosphorylation of the encoded protein is involved in cardiac myosin cycling kinetics, torsion and function in adults. Mutations in this gene are associated with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 10 and infant-onset myopathy. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.65).
BP6
Variant 12-110913117-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-110913117-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 36646.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr12-110913117-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr12-110913117-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-5.02 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00509 (775/152262) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0182 (755/41536). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0171. There are 10 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 337 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 775 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYL2 | NM_000432.4 | c.381G>A | p.Ala127= | synonymous_variant | 6/7 | ENST00000228841.15 | NP_000423.2 | |
MYL2 | NM_001406745.1 | c.339G>A | p.Ala113= | synonymous_variant | 5/6 | NP_001393674.1 | ||
MYL2 | NM_001406916.1 | c.324G>A | p.Ala108= | synonymous_variant | 6/7 | NP_001393845.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYL2 | ENST00000228841.15 | c.381G>A | p.Ala127= | synonymous_variant | 6/7 | 1 | NM_000432.4 | ENSP00000228841 | P1 | |
MYL2 | ENST00000548438.1 | c.339G>A | p.Ala113= | synonymous_variant | 5/6 | 3 | ENSP00000447154 | |||
MYL2 | ENST00000663220.1 | c.324G>A | p.Ala108= | synonymous_variant | 6/7 | ENSP00000499568 | ||||
MYL2 | ENST00000549029.1 | downstream_gene_variant | 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00509 AC: 775AN: 152144Hom.: 10 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
775
AN:
152144
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00120 AC: 301AN: 251490Hom.: 2 AF XY: 0.000861 AC XY: 117AN XY: 135920
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
301
AN:
251490
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
117
AN XY:
135920
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000506 AC: 739AN: 1461894Hom.: 10 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000433 AC XY: 315AN XY: 727248
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
739
AN:
1461894
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
315
AN XY:
727248
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00509 AC: 775AN: 152262Hom.: 10 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00453 AC XY: 337AN XY: 74454
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
775
AN:
152262
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
337
AN XY:
74454
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
5
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:16
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Jun 20, 2008 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jan 07, 2014 | - - |
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 10 Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | Sep 21, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Cardiomyopathy Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Mar 08, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Dec 03, 2015 | - - |
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Feb 05, 2024 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Cohesion Phenomics | Oct 10, 2022 | - - |
Primary familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Aug 18, 2011 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jul 15, 2015 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at