12-123671226-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP4_StrongBS1_Supporting
The NM_024809.5(TCTN2):c.-15C>T variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000342 in 1,610,070 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000020 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000036 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
TCTN2
NM_024809.5 5_prime_UTR
NM_024809.5 5_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.427
Genes affected
TCTN2 (HGNC:25774): (tectonic family member 2) This gene encodes a type I membrane protein that belongs to the tectonic family. Studies in mice suggest that this protein may be involved in hedgehog signaling, and essential for ciliogenesis. Mutations in this gene are associated with Meckel syndrome type 8. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2011]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.7).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.0000357 (52/1457772) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.00121 (48/39580). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00094. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 20 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCTN2 | NM_024809.5 | c.-15C>T | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/18 | ENST00000303372.7 | ||
TCTN2 | NM_001143850.3 | c.-15C>T | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/18 | |||
TCTN2 | NM_001410989.1 | c.-15C>T | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/17 | |||
TCTN2 | XM_017019974.2 | c.-15C>T | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/17 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCTN2 | ENST00000303372.7 | c.-15C>T | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/18 | 1 | NM_024809.5 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152180Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
3
AN:
152180
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000331 AC: 8AN: 242024Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000228 AC XY: 3AN XY: 131704
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
8
AN:
242024
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
131704
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000357 AC: 52AN: 1457772Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000276 AC XY: 20AN XY: 725016
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
52
AN:
1457772
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
20
AN XY:
725016
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152298Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74460
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
3
AN:
152298
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
74460
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
2
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Joubert syndrome 24 Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Baylor Genetics | Mar 27, 2019 | This variant was determined to be of uncertain significance according to ACMG Guidelines, 2015 [PMID:25741868]. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Meckel syndrome, type 8 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at