12-132687300-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_006231.4(POLE):c.16G>C(p.Gly6Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00488 in 1,505,724 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 27 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. G6S) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_006231.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POLE | NM_006231.4 | c.16G>C | p.Gly6Arg | missense_variant | 1/49 | ENST00000320574.10 | NP_006222.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POLE | ENST00000320574.10 | c.16G>C | p.Gly6Arg | missense_variant | 1/49 | 1 | NM_006231.4 | ENSP00000322570.5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00288 AC: 438AN: 151968Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00266 AC: 293AN: 110214Hom.: 2 AF XY: 0.00260 AC XY: 159AN XY: 61082
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00510 AC: 6903AN: 1353646Hom.: 27 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00505 AC XY: 3376AN XY: 667944
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00288 AC: 438AN: 152078Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00262 AC XY: 195AN XY: 74366
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2Benign:8
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | Nov 10, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Oct 25, 2023 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden | Nov 03, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Nov 01, 2024 | POLE: BS2 - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Feb 20, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
not specified Benign:6
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 07, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Apr 17, 2018 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Oct 15, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genomic Diagnostic Laboratory, Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia | Jul 22, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Aug 05, 2019 | Variant summary: POLE c.16G>C (p.Gly6Arg) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0027 in 110214 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0045 within the Non-Finnish European subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 1 homozygote. The observed variant frequency within Non-Finnish European control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 317 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in POLE causing Colorectal Cancer phenotype (1.4e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of Non-Finnish European origin. c.16G>C has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Colorectal Cancer (ex Kothari_2016). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Colorectal Cancer. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Ten clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. Nine of these ten have classified the variant as benign (n=3)/likely benign (n=6). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was re-evaluated as benign. - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 06, 2019 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | True Health Diagnostics | Dec 01, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Jul 31, 2020 | - - |
Colorectal cancer, susceptibility to, 12 Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetics and Molecular Pathology, SA Pathology | Dec 31, 2019 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Jul 06, 2016 | - - |
Carcinoma of colon Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The POLE p.Gly6Arg variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the MutDB database. The variant was identified in the following databases: dbSNP (ID: rs202220778) as “With other allele”, ClinVar and Clinvitae (9x as benign by Invitae and Ambry Genetics, as likely benign by Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Washington Medical Center, Counsyl, GeneDx, Quest Diagnostics, Integrated Genetics, and as uncertain significance by Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine). The variant was identified in control databases in 353 of 136976 chromosomes (2 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.0025 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the African in 13 of 11652 chromosomes (freq: 0.0011), “Other” in 11 of 3924 chromosomes (freq: 0.003), Latino in 51 of 21270 chromosomes (freq: 0.002), European Non-Finnish in 220 of 52786 chromosomes (freq: 0.004), Ashkenazi Jewish in 44 of 7670 chromosomes (freq: 0.006), European Finnish in 10 of 11688 chromosomes (freq: 0.00085), and South Asian in 4 of 19714 chromosomes (freq: 0.000203). While the variant was not observed in the East Asian, populations. The p.Gly6Arg residue is not conserved in mammals and four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. - |
Colorectal cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | research | CSER _CC_NCGL, University of Washington | Nov 01, 2015 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at