12-5635329-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBS2
The NM_001364791.2(ANO2):āc.1639A>Gā(p.Ile547Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00689 in 1,580,150 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 66 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/17 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001364791.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANO2 | NM_001364791.2 | c.1639A>G | p.Ile547Val | missense_variant | 16/25 | ENST00000682330.1 | NP_001351720.1 | |
ANO2 | NM_001278596.3 | c.1654A>G | p.Ile552Val | missense_variant | 18/27 | NP_001265525.1 | ||
ANO2 | NM_001278597.3 | c.1642A>G | p.Ile548Val | missense_variant | 18/27 | NP_001265526.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANO2 | ENST00000682330.1 | c.1639A>G | p.Ile547Val | missense_variant | 16/25 | NM_001364791.2 | ENSP00000507275.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00636 AC: 967AN: 152090Hom.: 10 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00750 AC: 1602AN: 213594Hom.: 12 AF XY: 0.00727 AC XY: 843AN XY: 116014
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00694 AC: 9916AN: 1427942Hom.: 56 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00673 AC XY: 4774AN XY: 708978
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00635 AC: 967AN: 152208Hom.: 10 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00708 AC XY: 527AN XY: 74426
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Mar 02, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at