13-24882874-G-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBS1_SupportingBS2

The NM_018451.5(CENPJ):​c.*303C>A variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00182 in 360,576 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0016 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0020 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

CENPJ
NM_018451.5 3_prime_UTR

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.214
Variant links:
Genes affected
CENPJ (HGNC:17272): (centromere protein J) This gene encodes a protein that belongs to the centromere protein family. During cell division, this protein plays a structural role in the maintenance of centrosome integrity and normal spindle morphology, and it is involved in microtubule disassembly at the centrosome. This protein can function as a transcriptional coactivator in the Stat5 signaling pathway, and also as a coactivator of NF-kappaB-mediated transcription, likely via its interaction with the coactivator p300/CREB-binding protein. Mutations in this gene are associated with primary autosomal recessive microcephaly, a disorder characterized by severely reduced brain size and cognitive disability. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2012]
RNF17 (HGNC:10060): (ring finger protein 17) This gene is similar to a mouse gene that encodes a testis-specific protein containing a RING finger domain. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found. [provided by RefSeq, May 2010]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.91).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00156 (234/150462) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00248 (167/67372). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00217. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 107 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 2 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
CENPJNM_018451.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.*303C>A 3_prime_UTR_variant 17/17 ENST00000381884.9 NP_060921.3 Q9HC77-1A8K8P1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CENPJENST00000381884 linkuse as main transcriptc.*303C>A 3_prime_UTR_variant 17/171 NM_018451.5 ENSP00000371308.4 Q9HC77-1
CENPJENST00000616936.4 linkuse as main transcriptn.*974C>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 16/161 ENSP00000477511.1 Q9HC77-2
CENPJENST00000616936.4 linkuse as main transcriptn.*974C>A 3_prime_UTR_variant 16/161 ENSP00000477511.1 Q9HC77-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00156
AC:
234
AN:
150340
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000707
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00180
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00146
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0000971
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00248
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00146
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00200
AC:
421
AN:
210114
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
0.00190
AC XY:
216
AN XY:
113834
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000849
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00135
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.000174
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00141
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00262
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00278
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00156
AC:
234
AN:
150462
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00146
AC XY:
107
AN XY:
73476
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000705
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00180
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00146
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0000971
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00248
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00144
Alfa
AF:
0.00211
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00173

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Seckel syndrome 4 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Microcephaly 6, primary, autosomal recessive Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.91
CADD
Benign
0.61
DANN
Benign
0.35

Splicing

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs886050094; hg19: chr13-25457012; API