Menu
GeneBe

13-32319184-C-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBP6

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.175C>G(p.Pro59Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000184 in 1,614,038 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P59R) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00097 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00010 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

3
13

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:15O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.853
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.011333466).
BP6
Variant 13-32319184-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32319184-C-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 51185.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=9, Benign=4, not_provided=1, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr13-32319184-C-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.175C>G p.Pro59Ala missense_variant 3/27 ENST00000380152.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.175C>G p.Pro59Ala missense_variant 3/275 NM_000059.4 A2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000966
AC:
147
AN:
152160
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00340
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000393
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000215
AC:
54
AN:
251358
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000132
AC XY:
18
AN XY:
135860
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00296
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000145
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00000880
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000103
AC:
150
AN:
1461760
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000825
AC XY:
60
AN XY:
727188
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00352
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000291
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
8.99e-7
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000265
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000965
AC:
147
AN:
152278
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000900
AC XY:
67
AN XY:
74466
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00339
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000392
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000109
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00117
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00295
AC:
13
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.000231
AC:
28

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:15Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3Other:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoDec 01, 2021- -
not provided, no classification providedreference populationITMISep 19, 2013- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesOct 07, 2016- -
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJun 02, 2021This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 29668487, 10923033, 24728327, 28873162, 21952622, 12491487) -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Nov 06, 2014- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoJun 30, 2022- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Mar 21, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthOct 26, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJul 21, 2014This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingNational Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free StateNov 16, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterresearchGenetics Program, Instituto Nacional de CancerNov 01, 2021- -
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingBreast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)Feb 20, 2004- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingSharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)Oct 22, 2009- -
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioJul 15, 2022- -
BRCA2-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesNov 13, 2020This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The BRCA2 p.Pro59Ala variant was identified in the literature. The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs56091799) as “With Uncertain significance, other allele”, the Clinvitae and ClinVar databases (classified as benign by Invitae, Ambry Genetics; classified as likely benign by GeneDx, SCRP; classified as uncertain significance by CHEO, Emory Genetics and BIC), the BIC database (10x with unknown clinical importance), and UMD (25x with as an unclassified variant). In UMD the variant was identified in two patients, each with a separate pathogenic variant (BRCA1: c.5541C>A, p.Cys1847X and BRCA2: c.5641_5644delAAAT, p.Lys1881GlnfsX27), increasing the likelihood that the p.Pro59Ala variant does not have clinical significance. This variant was identified in the 1000 Genomes Project in 1 of 5000 chromosomes (frequency: 0.0002), the NHLBI GO Exome Sequencing Project in 13 of 4406 African American alleles (freq. 0.003), the genome Aggregation Database (beta, October 19th 2016) in 87 of 282602 chromosomes (freq. 0.0003), the Exome Aggregation Consortium database (August 8th 2016) in 28 of 121204 chromosomes (freq. 0.0002) in the following populations: African in 28 of 10306 chromosomes (freq. 0.002), but was not seen in Asian, European, Finnish, Latino and Other populations, increasing the likelihood that this may be a low frequency benign variant in certain populations of origin. The variant was not identified in Fanconi Anemia Mutation Database (LOVD), LOVD-IARC database, ARUP Laboratories BRCA Mutations Database, COSMIC, GeneInsight COGR database. Computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein and this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and 1 of 5 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing; this is not very predictive of pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.095
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.40
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.35
Cadd
Benign
13
Dann
Uncertain
0.97
Eigen
Benign
-0.34
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.34
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.64
D
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.26
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.011
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.88
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.34
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.6
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.15
Sift
Uncertain
0.023
D;D
Sift4G
Benign
0.23
T;T
Vest4
0.31
MVP
0.85
MPC
0.081
ClinPred
0.021
T
GERP RS
1.8
gMVP
0.14

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs56091799; hg19: chr13-32893321; COSMIC: COSV99061741; COSMIC: COSV99061741; API