13-32340191-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM5BP4_StrongBP6
The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.5836T>C(p.Ser1946Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000744 in 1,613,520 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. S1946?) has been classified as Pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000059.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | ENST00000380152.8 | c.5836T>C | p.Ser1946Pro | missense_variant | 11/27 | 5 | NM_000059.4 | ENSP00000369497.3 | ||
BRCA2 | ENST00000530893.7 | c.5467T>C | p.Ser1823Pro | missense_variant | 11/27 | 1 | ENSP00000499438.2 | |||
BRCA2 | ENST00000614259.2 | n.5836T>C | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 10/26 | 2 | ENSP00000506251.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000329 AC: 5AN: 152132Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000159 AC: 4AN: 250906Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000737 AC XY: 1AN XY: 135714
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000479 AC: 7AN: 1461270Hom.: 0 Cov.: 46 AF XY: 0.00000413 AC XY: 3AN XY: 726870
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000328 AC: 5AN: 152250Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000403 AC XY: 3AN XY: 74438
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | May 05, 2023 | This missense variant replaces serine with proline at codon 1946 of the BRCA2 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has been reported in several individuals affected with breast or ovarian cancer (PMID: 30287823, 30982232, 32846166, 35300142). This variant was detected in two siblings affected with ovarian cancer and in two unaffected siblings in a family with a history of pancreatic and colorectal cancer (PMID: 27907908). In a large breast cancer case-control study conducted by the BRIDGES consortium, this variant was reported in 6/60466 cases and 4/53461 unaffected controls, showing inconclusive association with disease (OR=1.326 (95%CI 0.374 to 4.7); p-value=0.759; Leiden Open Variation Database DB-ID BRCA2_001760) (PMID: 33471991). This variant has been identified in 8/282304 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | University of Washington Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington | Mar 23, 2023 | Missense variant in a coldspot region where missense variants are very unlikely to be pathogenic (PMID:31911673). - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jun 13, 2018 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The BRCA2 p.Ser1946Pro variant was identified in 3 of 2172 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.001) from Chinese and Taiwanese individuals or families with breast disease (benign and cancerous) and ovarian cancer, and was not identified in 638 control chromosomes from healthy individuals (Suter 2004, Chao 2016). The variant was found in 2 sisters with ovarian cancer, who had a history of familial malignancies (pancreatic and colon cancer) but segregation studies were not done (Chao 2016); Suter (2004) identified the variant in an individual with benign breast disease. The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs80358811) “With Uncertain significance allele”, ClinVar (classified as uncertain significance (2016); submitters: Invitae, Ambry Genetics, GeneDx, BIC, and Laboratory Corporation of America), Clinvitae (4x), LOVD 3.0 (1x), UMD-LSDB (2x as 3-UV), and BIC Database (1x, clinical importance unknown, classification pending) and was not identified in GeneInsight – COGR (unavailable), Cosmic, ARUP Laboratories, and Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database. The variant was identified in control databases in 8 of 276890 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00003 increasing the likelihood that this may be a low frequency benign variant in certain populations of origin (Genome Aggregation Consortium Feb 27, 2017), being identified in the following populations: African in 2 of 24018 chromosomes (frequency: 0.00008) and East Asian in 6 of 18868 chromosomes (frequency: 0.0003). The p.Ser1946 residue is not conserved in mammals and four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2) | - | - - |
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Apr 24, 2022 | Variant summary: BRCA2 c.5836T>C (p.Ser1946Pro) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 2.4e-05 in 253498 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.5836T>C has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Breast and Ovarian Cancer or other types of cancer (Suter_2004, Chao_2016, Azzollini_2016, Chandrasekharappa_2017, Pajares_2018, Wang_2019). In one study, this variant was found in two siblings affected with ovarian cancer (Chao_2016). However, it was also found in other two unaffected siblings (age unknown). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. At-least one co-occurrence with another pathogenic variant(s) has been reported in the BIC database (BRCA1 c.5509T>C, p.Trp1837Arg), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Four clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation (VUS, n=3; likely benign, n=1). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as VUS-possibly benign. - |
BRCA2-related cancer predisposition Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Aug 13, 2024 | This missense variant replaces serine with proline at codon 1946 of the BRCA2 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has been reported in several individuals affected with breast or ovarian cancer (PMID: 30287823, 30982232, 32846166, 35300142). This variant was detected in two siblings affected with ovarian cancer and in two unaffected siblings in a family with a history of pancreatic and colorectal cancer (PMID: 27907908). In a large breast cancer case-control study conducted by the BRIDGES consortium, this variant was reported in 6/60466 cases and 4/53461 unaffected controls, showing inconclusive association with disease (OR=1.326 (95%CI 0.374 to 4.7); p-value=0.759; Leiden Open Variation Database DB-ID BRCA2_001760) (PMID: 33471991). This variant has been identified in 8/282304 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Feb 05, 2018 | This variant is denoted BRCA2 c.5836T>C at the cDNA level, p.Ser1946Pro (S1946P) at the protein level, and results in the change of a Serine to a Proline (TCA>CCA). This variant, also defined as 6064T>C using alternate nomenclature, has been reported in a woman with benign breast disease and in a healthy control cohort (Suter 2004, Kwong 2016); however, it has also been identified in two sisters with ovarian cancer, with the tumor from one demonstrating loss of heterozygosity at the BRCA2 locus (Chao 2016). BRCA2 Ser1946Pro was not observed at a significant allele frequency in large population cohorts (Lek 2016). This variant is located in the RAD51 binding domain (Roy 2012). In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function. Based on currently available evidence, it is unclear whether BRCA2 Ser1946Pro is a pathogenic or benign variant. We consider it to be a variant of uncertain significance. - |
Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | Center for Precision Medicine, Meizhou People's Hospital | - | - - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Sep 12, 2024 | This sequence change replaces serine, which is neutral and polar, with proline, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 1946 of the BRCA2 protein (p.Ser1946Pro). This variant is present in population databases (rs80358811, gnomAD 0.03%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with breast cancer, ovarian cancer, and/or squamous cell carcinoma (PMID: 27062684, 27907908, 28678401, 30287823, 30982232, 31825140, 32846166, 35300142, 35918668). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 51948). Invitae Evidence Modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt BRCA2 protein function with a negative predictive value of 95%. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at