13-32344651-A-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP6_Very_StrongBS2
The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.6935A>T(p.Asp2312Val) variant causes a missense, splice region change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000141 in 1,558,374 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 2/3 splice prediction tools predicting alterations to normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000072 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00015 ( 4 hom. )
Consequence
BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense, splice_region
NM_000059.4 missense, splice_region
Scores
3
7
6
Splicing: ADA: 0.9966
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 5.07
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.
BP6
Variant 13-32344651-A-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32344651-A-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 52220.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr13-32344651-A-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 4 AD,AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | NM_000059.4 | c.6935A>T | p.Asp2312Val | missense_variant, splice_region_variant | 12/27 | ENST00000380152.8 | NP_000050.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | ENST00000380152.8 | c.6935A>T | p.Asp2312Val | missense_variant, splice_region_variant | 12/27 | 5 | NM_000059.4 | ENSP00000369497.3 | ||
BRCA2 | ENST00000530893.7 | c.6566A>T | p.Asp2189Val | missense_variant, splice_region_variant | 12/27 | 1 | ENSP00000499438.2 | |||
BRCA2 | ENST00000614259.2 | n.6935A>T | splice_region_variant, non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 11/26 | 2 | ENSP00000506251.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000723 AC: 11AN: 152100Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
11
AN:
152100
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000244 AC: 61AN: 249766Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000369 AC XY: 50AN XY: 135340
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
61
AN:
249766
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
50
AN XY:
135340
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000149 AC: 209AN: 1406156Hom.: 4 Cov.: 27 AF XY: 0.000202 AC XY: 142AN XY: 702668
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
209
AN:
1406156
Hom.:
Cov.:
27
AF XY:
AC XY:
142
AN XY:
702668
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000723 AC: 11AN: 152218Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000672 AC XY: 5AN XY: 74418
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
11
AN:
152218
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
5
AN XY:
74418
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ExAC
AF:
AC:
32
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
3476
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:20
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:1Benign:5
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | BRCAlab, Lund University | Mar 02, 2020 | - - |
Benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA) | Jun 18, 2019 | IARC class based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis, thresholds for class as per Plon et al. 2008 (PMID: 18951446). Class 1 based on posterior probability = 0.000027 - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2) | May 29, 2002 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Jul 29, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Jul 11, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C. | Jul 12, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Dec 16, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 19, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 07, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The BRCA2 p.Asp2312Val variant was identified in 3 of 4718 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.0006) from Brazilian, German and Other individuals or families at high risk of breast and ovarian cancers, and was present in 1 of 230 control chromosomes (frequency: 0.004) from healthy elderly Croatian women (Fernandes 2016, Trujillano_2015, Brandao 2011). The variant was identified by Brandao (2011) in an individual from a high-risk breast and/or ovarian cancer family and RT-PCR transcript analysis of lymphocytes from this individual showed an increase in exon12 skipping as compared to normal controls; however, the BRCA2 exon 12 deletion isoform is naturally occurring and the c.6935T allele expressed full-length transcript at similar expression levels compared with the wild-type (WT) allele and control alleles suggesting the variant is likely to be neutral. Li (2009) studied a different variant in this region which was also shown to increase exon 12 skipping, and functional results from this study did not detect any difference between this variant and wild type, suggesting that exon 12 is functionally redundant and missense changes in this region are likely to be neutral. In addition, Li (2009) notes that the peptide encoded by exon 12 does not contain any known important functional motifs; however, this region may have a role in processes that were not assessed. An in silico likelihood-ratio study by Easton (2007) suggests that this variant is neutral. In addition, a splice study using 6 in silico models, with predictions compared to transcript analysis showed the variant does not effect change on splicing (Houdayer 2012). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs80358916), ClinVar (with conflicting interpretations of pathogenicity; classified as benign by Ambry Genetics, Counsyl, Invitae; likely benign by Prevention Genetics, Div of Genomic Diagnostics - Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Illumina Clinical Services, GeneDx; and uncertain significance by BIC), Clinvitae (5X), LOVD 3.0 (4x), UMD-LSDB (10X, 1-neutral), and the BIC Database (5x, clinical importance unknown, classification pending). The variant was not identified in the COGR, Cosmic, ARUP Laboratories, and Zhejiang Colon Cancer Databases. The variant was also identified in control databases in 64 (1 homozygous) of 276074 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0002 in the following populations: other in 1 of 6424 chromosomes (freq. 0.00016), European in 2 of 126058 chromosomes (freq. 0.000016), Ashkenazi Jewish in 1 of 10110 chromosomes (freq. 0.0001), South Asian in 60 of 30712 chromosomes (freq. 0.0002), increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency variant (Genome Aggregation Consortium Feb 27, 2017). The variant was also identified by our laboratory in 3 individuals with breast and ovarian cancer. The p.Asp2312 residue is conserved in mammals but not in more distantly related organisms, and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) suggest that the variant may impact the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to assume pathogenicity. The p.Asp2312Val variant occurs in the 3rd last base of the exon. This position has been shown to be part of the splicing consensus sequence and variants involving this position sometimes affect splicing. In addition, 2 of 5 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jun 27, 2016 | Variant summary: The BRCA2 c.6935A>T (p.Asp2312Val) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. 5/5 in silico tools predict damaging outcome for this variant. This variant is only three nucleotides away from the nearest exon-intron boundary and is thus predicted to affect normal splicing. 3/5 splice prediction tools predict a significant impact on normal splicing. But in vitro studies show that this variant does not significantly affect normal splicing (Houdayer_2011, Brandao_2011). This variant was found in 32/113924 control chromosomes (including one homozygote), predominantly observed in the South Asian, subpopulation at a frequency of 0.0016915 (27/15962). This frequency is about 2 times higher than the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic BRCA2 variant (0.0007503), suggesting this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of South Asian. This variant has been reported in several instances in HBOC patients and/or individuals undergoing BRCA1/2 testing including co-occurrence with another deleterious variant (p.Lys1026Ter) in the same gene, strongly supporting for the benign outcome. Multifactorial probability-based models are also consistent with the benign outcome. Multiple clinical labs have classified this variant as benign/likely benign. Taken together, this variant is currently classified as Likely Benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Sep 08, 2023 | - - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 28, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genomic Diagnostic Laboratory, Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia | Jul 10, 2015 | - - |
Medulloblastoma;C0346153:Familial cancer of breast;C0376358:Malignant tumor of prostate;C1838457:Fanconi anemia complementation group D1;C2675520:Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2;C2751641:Glioma susceptibility 3;C3150546:Pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 2;CN033288:Wilms tumor 1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | May 04, 2022 | - - |
Fanconi anemia complementation group D1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
BRCA2-related cancer predisposition Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Sep 23, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
CADD
Pathogenic
DANN
Uncertain
Eigen
Uncertain
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
M_CAP
Uncertain
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
D
PrimateAI
Benign
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N;N
REVEL
Pathogenic
Sift
Pathogenic
D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
D;D
Vest4
MutPred
Loss of ubiquitination at K2316 (P = 0.022);Loss of ubiquitination at K2316 (P = 0.022);
MVP
MPC
0.18
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Pathogenic
dbscSNV1_RF
Pathogenic
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
DS_DL_spliceai
Position offset: 2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at